Re: shapes-ISSUE-154 (value set not defined): the description of sh:equals and sh:disjoint use the term "value set", which is not defined from Holger Knublauch on 2016-04-28 (public-data-shapes-wg@w3.org from April 2016)

From: Holger Knublauch <holger@topquadrant.com>
Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2016 17:23:40 +1000
To: RDF Data Shapes Working Group <public-data-shapes-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <f71c6d5f-4316-2cc7-9294-dd0f848d6cfc@topquadrant.com>

The term "value set" is used with its intuitive plain english meaning, 
based on the assumption that the reader knows what the team "value" of a 
property means. A value set is then simply the set of all values. How 
could this be misinterpreted by anyone?

Holger

On 28/04/2016 16:51, RDF Data Shapes Working Group Issue Tracker wrote:
> shapes-ISSUE-154 (value set not defined): the description of sh:equals and sh:disjoint use the term "value set", which is not defined
>
> http://www.w3.org/2014/data-shapes/track/issues/154
>
> Raised by: Dean Allemang
> On product:
>
> There is no description or definition of "value set", which is used in the description of sh:equals and sh:disjoint.
>
>
>

Received on Thursday, 28 April 2016 07:24:12 UTC