Implementation: Anno4j
Fun with testing
Client & Server code
Re: [web-annotation] Tweaks for mnot's TAG comments
[web-annotation] Discuss re-introducing Named Graph resources
Meeting minutes, 2016-06-24
[web-annotation] De-normative-ify reference to ldp-paging
- Closed: [web-annotation] De-normative-ify reference to ldp-paging
- Re: [web-annotation] De-normative-ify reference to ldp-paging
[web-annotation] TAG comments (@mnot)
Re: [web-annotation] Fix example 15 in protocol
- Re: [web-annotation] Fix example 15 in protocol
- Re: [web-annotation] Fix example 15 in protocol
- Re: [web-annotation] Fix example 15 in protocol
[web-annotation] "5.1 Create a New Annotation" references using Prefer in response to a creation request
- Closed: [web-annotation] "5.1 Create a New Annotation" references using Prefer in response to a creation request
- Re: [web-annotation] "5.1 Create a New Annotation" references using Prefer in response to a creation request
Updated: Agenda for Friday's meeting of the Web Annotation Working Group
Agenda for Friday's meeting of the Web Annotation Working Group
Re: [web-annotation] Raphael -> Raphaël
[web-annotation] Support for embedded structured data (metadata) in the body
- Re: [web-annotation] Support for embedded structured data (metadata) in the body
- Re: [web-annotation] Support for embedded structured data (metadata) in the body
- Re: [web-annotation] Support for embedded structured data (metadata) in the body
- Re: [web-annotation] Support for embedded structured data (metadata) in the body
- Re: [web-annotation] Support for embedded structured data (metadata) in the body
- Re: [web-annotation] Support for embedded structured data (metadata) in the body
- Re: [web-annotation] Support for embedded structured data (metadata) in the body
- Re: [web-annotation] Support for embedded structured data (metadata) in the body
- Re: [web-annotation] Support for embedded structured data (metadata) in the body
- Re: [web-annotation] Support for embedded structured data (metadata) in the body
- Re: [web-annotation] Support for embedded structured data (metadata) in the body
- Re: [web-annotation] Support for embedded structured data (metadata) in the body
- Re: [web-annotation] Support for embedded structured data (metadata) in the body
- Re: [web-annotation] Support for embedded structured data (metadata) in the body
- Re: [web-annotation] Support for embedded structured data (metadata) in the body
- Re: [web-annotation] Support for embedded structured data (metadata) in the body
- Re: [web-annotation] Support for embedded structured data (metadata) in the body
- Re: [web-annotation] Support for embedded structured data (metadata) in the body
- Closed: [web-annotation] Support for embedded structured data (metadata) in the body
- Re: [web-annotation] Support for embedded structured data (metadata) in the body
[web-annotation] Which is the relationship between the format and the type of External Web resources?
- Re: [web-annotation] Which is the relationship between the format and the type of External Web resources?
- Re: [web-annotation] Which is the relationship between the format and the type of External Web resources?
- Re: [web-annotation] Which is the relationship between the format and the type of External Web resources?
- Re: [web-annotation] Which is the relationship between the format and the type of External Web resources?
[web-annotation] Link errors in the vocab document
- Re: [web-annotation] Link errors in the vocab document
- Closed: [web-annotation] Link errors in the vocab document
- Re: [web-annotation] Link errors in the vocab document
Re: [web-annotation] First round of link checking
Protocol question: PreferMinimalContainer
CANCEL this week's Web Anno WG call
[web-annotation] 4.1.1 Client Preferences uses `ns/oa` while examples use `ns/ldp`
- Re: [web-annotation] 4.1.1 Client Preferences uses `ns/oa` while examples use `ns/ldp`
- Re: [web-annotation] 4.1.1 Client Preferences uses `ns/oa` while examples use `ns/ldp`
- Closed: [web-annotation] 4.1.1 Client Preferences uses `ns/oa` while examples use `ns/ldp`
- Re: [web-annotation] 4.1.1 Client Preferences uses `ns/oa` while examples use `ns/ldp`
Re: [web-annotation] First round of pubrules' checker changes
Annotation Model framework submitted to WPT for review
[web-annotation] content-length in protocol examples are wrong
Re: [Testdev] [model-test] folder tree -- was: referencing external schema
Change to the definition of a Assertion List
Sample implementation reports
ACTION-33: Where should I put the document?
Meeting minutes - 2016-06-10
anno-ACTION-33: Write up drafty test process document for model, server, and clients
[testing - model] Incomplete spreadsheet of tests/schemas
[web-annotation] (Protocol) Editorial issues about IRI
- Re: [web-annotation] (Protocol) Editorial issues about IRI
- Re: [web-annotation] (Protocol) Editorial issues about IRI
- Re: [web-annotation] (Protocol) Editorial issues about IRI
- Closed: [web-annotation] (Protocol) Editorial issues about IRI
[web-annotation] processingLanguage nitpicks
[web-annotation] Should the fragment specification URLs be https?
- Re: [web-annotation] Should the fragment specification URLs be https?
- Re: [web-annotation] Should the fragment specification URLs be https?
- Re: [web-annotation] Should the fragment specification URLs be https?
- Re: [web-annotation] Should the fragment specification URLs be https?
- Re: [web-annotation] Should the fragment specification URLs be https?
- Re: [web-annotation] Should the fragment specification URLs be https?
- Closed: [web-annotation] Should the fragment specification URLs be https?
RE: [Testdev] [model-test] folder tree -- was: referencing external schema
[web-annotation] Fragment Specification for RDFa
- Re: [web-annotation] Fragment Specification for RDFa
- Re: [web-annotation] Fragment Specification for RDFa
- Closed: [web-annotation] Fragment Specification for RDFa
- Re: [web-annotation] Fragment Specification for RDFa
- Re: [web-annotation] Fragment Specification for RDFa
Agenda for Friday's meeting of the Working Group
[web-annotation] Fix "SoftwareAgent" in two examples
- Re: [web-annotation] Fix "SoftwareAgent" in two examples
- Closed: [web-annotation] Fix "SoftwareAgent" in two examples
[web-annotation] Add a `Collection Response with Contained Description`
- Re: [web-annotation] Add a `Collection Response with Contained Description`
- Re: [web-annotation] Add a `Collection Response with Contained Description`
- Closed: [web-annotation] Add a `Collection Response with Contained Description`
Quick update
Re: [web-annotation] Line folding in HTTP headers is deprecated as of RFC7230
- Re: [web-annotation] Line folding in HTTP headers is deprecated as of RFC7230
- Re: [web-annotation] Line folding in HTTP headers is deprecated as of RFC7230
- Re: [web-annotation] Line folding in HTTP headers is deprecated as of RFC7230
Cleaning up issues' list
Re: [web-annotation] Should Annotation concept and document be distinguished?
Milestone set up: V1 CR
[web-annotation] Admin information to be added to the document for CR
- Re: [web-annotation] Admin information to be added to the document for CR
- Re: [web-annotation] Admin information to be added to the document for CR
- Re: [web-annotation] Admin information to be added to the document for CR
- Re: [web-annotation] Admin information to be added to the document for CR
- Re: [web-annotation] Admin information to be added to the document for CR
- Closed: [web-annotation] Admin information to be added to the document for CR
[web-annotation] Create SVG versions of diagrams
Re: [web-annotation] Add diagrams to Vocab examples
Closed: [web-annotation] Add diagrams to Vocab examples
Re: [web-annotation] Yet more diagrams
[web-annotation] Diagram inconsistencies (in pull request #279)
- Re: [web-annotation] Diagram inconsistencies (in pull request #279)
- Re: [web-annotation] Diagram inconsistencies (in pull request #279)
- Closed: [web-annotation] Diagram inconsistencies (in pull request #279)
Re: [web-annotation] At Risks, Change Logs
CFC: Publish Model, Vocab, Protocol as Candidate Recommendations
- Re: CFC: Publish Model, Vocab, Protocol as Candidate Recommendations
- AW: Publish Model, Vocab, Protocol as Candidate Recommendations
- Re: CFC: Publish Model, Vocab, Protocol as Candidate Recommendations
- Re: CFC: Publish Model, Vocab, Protocol as Candidate Recommendations
- RE: Publish Model, Vocab, Protocol as Candidate Recommendations
[web-annotation] Add Accept-Post to subsequent example?
- Closed: [web-annotation] Add Accept-Post to subsequent example?
- Re: [web-annotation] Add Accept-Post to subsequent example?
- Re: [web-annotation] Add Accept-Post to subsequent example?
Re: [web-annotation] JSON-LD Frames should be dereferenceable ... where?
- Re: [web-annotation] JSON-LD Frames should be dereferenceable ... where?
- Re: [web-annotation] JSON-LD Frames should be dereferenceable ... where?
- Re: [web-annotation] JSON-LD Frames should be dereferenceable ... where?
- Re: [web-annotation] JSON-LD Frames should be dereferenceable ... where?
- Re: [web-annotation] JSON-LD Frames should be dereferenceable ... where?
Re: [web-annotation] Normative refs ; change log
Closed: [web-annotation] Normative refs ; change log
CR transition admin draft
[web-annotation] Changes' sections should be completed
[web-annotation] At-Risk feature must be documented in the status section
Re: [web-annotation] Add accessibility to the model & vocab
[web-annotation] Final few examples needed
- Re: [web-annotation] Final few examples needed
- Closed: [web-annotation] Final few examples needed
- Re: [web-annotation] Final few examples needed
Re: [web-annotation] Update index-nametemplate.html
Re: [web-annotation] figures examples 39-44
- Re: [web-annotation] figures examples 39-44
- Re: [web-annotation] figures examples 39-44
- Re: [web-annotation] figures examples 39-44
- Re: [web-annotation] figures examples 39-44
- Re: [web-annotation] figures examples 39-44
- Re: [web-annotation] figures examples 39-44
[web-annotation] Minor upper/lower case issues
[web-annotation] Examples 6 and 7 and purpose=commenting
- Re: [web-annotation] Examples 6 and 7 and purpose=commenting
- Closed: [web-annotation] Examples 6 and 7 and purpose=commenting
[web-annotation] 'Web Resource' not consistent across the document
- Re: [web-annotation] 'Web Resource' not consistent across the document
- Closed: [web-annotation] 'Web Resource' not consistent across the document
Re: [web-annotation] protocol testing requirements
[web-annotation] respec highlighting errors
- Re: [web-annotation] respec highlighting errors
- Re: [web-annotation] respec highlighting errors
- Re: [web-annotation] respec highlighting errors
- Re: [web-annotation] respec does not correctly highlight turtle examples
- Re: [web-annotation] respec does not correctly highlight turtle examples
- Re: [web-annotation] respec does not correctly highlight turtle examples
- Re: [web-annotation] respec does not correctly highlight turtle examples
- Re: [web-annotation] respec does not correctly highlight turtle examples
- Re: [web-annotation] respec does not correctly highlight turtle examples
- Re: [web-annotation] respec does not correctly highlight turtle examples
- Re: [web-annotation] respec does not correctly highlight turtle examples
- Re: [web-annotation] respec does not correctly highlight turtle examples
- Re: [web-annotation] respec does not correctly highlight turtle examples
- Closed: [web-annotation] respec does not correctly highlight turtle examples
- Re: [web-annotation] respec does not correctly highlight turtle examples
Re: [web-annotation] Update Appendix C (slightly)
Meeting minutes, 2016-06-03
Closed: [web-annotation] Add pointer to TextualBody to bodyValue
Closed: [web-annotation] Remove "and so forth", clarify utf-8 encoding
Closed: [web-annotation] Model is defined in terms of IRIs; Protocol with URI
Closed: [web-annotation] Add accessibility to the model & vocab
Closed: [web-annotation] Data type, cardinality questions, typos
Closed: [web-annotation] Add a recommendation for HTTPS into the protocol spec
Closed: [web-annotation] white space normalisation
Closed: [web-annotation] Normalisation of Text Quote Selector
Closed: [web-annotation] Use of dc:language
Closed: [web-annotation] 'generated' and 'modified' should use UTC by default
Closed: [web-annotation] Deref of namespace should go to vocab?
Closed: [web-annotation] Status code requirements should be in the sections of Protocol
Closed: [web-annotation] Base direction for annotations
Closed: [web-annotation] TimeState, generated, and modified should recommend all values use UTC
Closed: [web-annotation] Model Typos
Closed: [web-annotation] Minor issues with the individuals' formatting in the vocab spec
Closed: [web-annotation] exactly 0 or 1 language(s)
Closed: [web-annotation] (model) vague definition of character position for text position selector
Closed: [web-annotation] Explain extending spec with new classes, esp Selectors
Closed: [web-annotation] Model should allow multiple Selectors per SpecificResource
Closed: [web-annotation] Request header and language negotiation
Closed: [web-annotation] (model) have a note on logical and visual order of text for text quote selector implementations
Closed: [web-annotation] Can I refine a state via a selector?
Closed: [web-annotation] Should oa:start / oa:end be xsd:nonNegativeInteger or xsd:integer ?
Closed: [web-annotation] Consistent definitions of the id for External Web Resources and Specific Resources
Closed: [web-annotation] Change 'reviewing' to 'assessing'?
[web-annotation] Including resource previews in annotations
- Re: [web-annotation] Including resource previews in annotations
- Re: [web-annotation] Including resource previews in annotations
- Re: [web-annotation] Including resource previews in annotations
- Re: [web-annotation] Including resource previews in annotations
- Re: [web-annotation] Including resource previews in annotations
- Re: [web-annotation] Including resource previews in annotations
- Re: [web-annotation] Including resource previews in annotations
Re: [web-annotation] `account` likely to conflict with foaf:account
Friday's Agenda for the Web Annotation Working Group - 3 June at 11 AM Eastern (US)
Re: [web-annotation] Delete extraneous / unused content
- Re: [web-annotation] Delete extraneous / unused content
- Re: [web-annotation] Delete extraneous / unused content
- Re: [web-annotation] Delete extraneous / unused content
Re: [web-annotation] typo in Protocol: rdf:label
- Re: [web-annotation] typo in Protocol: rdf:label
- Re: [web-annotation] typo in Protocol: rdf:label
- Re: [web-annotation] typo in Protocol: rdf:label
- Re: [web-annotation] typo in Protocol: rdf:label
[model-test] referencing external schema
- Re: [Testdev] [model-test] referencing external schema
Re: [web-annotation] Consistent definitions of the id for External Web Resources and Specific Resources
- Re: [web-annotation] Consistent definitions of the id for External Web Resources and Specific Resources
- Re: [web-annotation] Consistent definitions of the id for External Web Resources and Specific Resources
- Re: [web-annotation] Consistent definitions of the id for External Web Resources and Specific Resources
- Re: [web-annotation] Consistent definitions of the id for External Web Resources and Specific Resources
- Re: [web-annotation] Consistent definitions of the id for External Web Resources and Specific Resources
- Re: [web-annotation] Consistent definitions of the id for External Web Resources and Specific Resources
- Re: [web-annotation] Consistent definitions of the id for External Web Resources and Specific Resources
- Re: [web-annotation] Consistent definitions of the id for External Web Resources and Specific Resources
- Re: [web-annotation] Consistent definitions of the id for External Web Resources and Specific Resources
- Re: [web-annotation] Consistent definitions of the id for External Web Resources and Specific Resources
[web-annotation] Track alignment between motivations and other ontologies
Re: [web-annotation] Relationship between Motivations and Actions (from schema.org)
Closed: [web-annotation] Relationship between Motivations and Actions (from schema.org)
Re: [web-annotation] Remove purpose=commenting requirement from bodyValue
- Re: [web-annotation] Remove purpose=commenting requirement from bodyValue
- Re: [web-annotation] Remove purpose=commenting requirement from bodyValue
- Re: [web-annotation] Remove purpose=commenting requirement from bodyValue
Re: New Web Annotation motivation for (data quality) assessment?
- Re: New Web Annotation motivation for (data quality) assessment?
- Re: New Web Annotation motivation for (data quality) assessment?
Re: Annotations with RDF statements
Re: [web-annotation] Model Typos
Re: [web-annotation] Reference to text encoding in spec perhaps not appropriate
- Re: [web-annotation] Reference to text encoding in spec perhaps not appropriate
- Re: [web-annotation] Reference to text encoding in spec perhaps not appropriate
- Re: [web-annotation] Reference to text encoding in spec perhaps not appropriate
- Re: [web-annotation] Reference to text encoding in spec perhaps not appropriate
- Re: [web-annotation] Reference to text encoding in spec perhaps not appropriate
- Re: [web-annotation] Reference to text encoding in spec perhaps not appropriate
- Re: [web-annotation] Reference to text encoding in spec perhaps not appropriate
- Re: [web-annotation] Reference to text encoding in spec perhaps not appropriate
- Re: [web-annotation] Reference to text encoding in spec perhaps not appropriate
- Re: [web-annotation] Reference to text encoding in spec perhaps not appropriate
- Re: [web-annotation] Reference to text encoding in spec perhaps not appropriate
- Re: [web-annotation] Reference to text encoding in spec perhaps not appropriate
- Re: [web-annotation] Reference to text encoding in spec perhaps not appropriate
- Re: [web-annotation] Reference to text encoding in spec perhaps not appropriate
- Re: [web-annotation] Reference to text encoding in spec perhaps not appropriate
- Re: [web-annotation] Reference to text encoding in spec perhaps not appropriate
- Re: [web-annotation] Reference to text encoding in spec perhaps not appropriate
- Re: [web-annotation] Reference to text encoding in spec perhaps not appropriate
- Re: [web-annotation] Reference to text encoding in spec perhaps not appropriate
- Re: [web-annotation] Reference to text encoding in spec perhaps not appropriate