- From: BigBlueHat via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2016 14:17:30 +0000
- To: public-annotation@w3.org
Hold up...reopening because the prose in that section is wrong if what you say (and the example) is correct. Here's the prose from 5.1. > The response MUST include a Link header with the target IRI of http://www.w3.org/ns/ldp#Resource and the rel parameter value of type to advertise that this is an RDF Source, according to the LDP specification [ldp]. It MAY also include the IRI http://www.w3.org/ns/oa#Annotation with the same rel parameter of type to also assert that it is an Annotation following the Web Annotation specifications. So one of these things is incorrect (either the example or the prose)...right? -- GitHub Notification of comment by BigBlueHat Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/web-annotation/pull/311#issuecomment-228357721 using your GitHub account
Received on Friday, 24 June 2016 14:17:34 UTC