- From: Ivan Herman via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2016 09:47:01 +0000
- To: public-annotation@w3.org
> On 21 Jun 2016, at 11:28, gsergiu <notifications@github.com> wrote: > > @iherman <https://github.com/iherman> yes, you are rigth, I'm analyzing the issue in a larger context. But there are still smaller issue closely related to the current version of the standard: > > Could we add an example of extensions for the body? > Could this example use the "type":"Dataset"? I think that embeded Dataset is quite a common/important usecase which is probably supported by the current specifications, but there is no example of not making it explicit > There is only one mention of the named graphs in the stadard, is the following recommendation still standing, especially in the context of extensions? Deprecate embedded graphs as an explicit part of the model, instead just include or reference a serialized graph. @gsergiu, I am extremely conservative at this point, mindful of the Working Group's schedules, editorial jobs, priorities. So my preference is _not_ to add anything to the current specs. -- GitHub Notification of comment by iherman Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/web-annotation/issues/309#issuecomment-227392307 using your GitHub account
Received on Tuesday, 21 June 2016 09:47:08 UTC