- From: Ivan Herman via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 09 Jun 2016 18:18:04 +0000
- To: public-annotation@w3.org
Unfortunately, this is not clear. Formally, a fragment is defined for a media type; but HTML+RDFa is *not* a separate media type. Ie, there is no choice in defining the fragment, it is simply for HTML. In practice, applications may have a different interpretations, but this document should not go there. The list of fragment types in the document is not a closed list, actually, applications may consider other ones. B.t.w., the documents are now officially in feature freeze. I propose closing this issue. Can you do it please? -- GitHub Notification of comment by iherman Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/web-annotation/issues/295#issuecomment-224981723 using your GitHub account
Received on Thursday, 9 June 2016 18:18:05 UTC