Re: [web-annotation] Fragment Specification for RDFa

Unfortunately, this is not clear. Formally, a fragment is defined for 
a media type; but HTML+RDFa is *not* a separate media type. Ie, there 
is no choice in defining the fragment, it is simply for HTML. In 
practice, applications may have a different interpretations, but this 
document should not go there. The list of fragment types in the 
document is not a closed list, actually, applications may consider 
other ones.

B.t.w., the documents are now officially in feature freeze. I propose 
closing this issue. Can you do it please?

GitHub Notification of comment by iherman
Please view or discuss this issue at
 using your GitHub account

Received on Thursday, 9 June 2016 18:18:05 UTC