Re: [web-annotation] Consistent definitions of the id for External Web Resources and Specific Resources

@azaroth42  for the SpecificResource and the "source" Resource are two
 different resources, right?
For TextualBody is no need to reference an external resource, as the 
text is embeded. 

However, for ExternalResources  I'm not convinced that the Body should
 be considered the same resource as the External Resource. Especially 
when the annotations have the possibility to add "rights" statements 
to the Body=ExternalReource, or to extend the context of the body and 
add additional elements.  Over the time, or by mistake the statements 
from the Body might conflict with the Statements from the 
ExternalResource (as retrieved per ID).  I think it is safer and more 
correct to consider the ExternalResource body as a different resource,
 that the referenced one. 
The BodyResource is owned by the creator of the annotaion, basically 
containing his assertions, while the ExternalResource has another 
owner, and properties like right, must be declared only by the owner 
of the resource (in my opinion).


GitHub Notification of comment by gsergiu
Please view or discuss this issue at
 using your GitHub account

Received on Wednesday, 1 June 2016 21:47:21 UTC