- From: Benjamin Young <byoung@bigbluehat.com>
- Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2016 20:24:55 +0000
- To: Robert Sanderson <azaroth42@gmail.com>, Web Annotation <public-annotation@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CY1PR0601MB1488D21039A2884D3CE7971FB2210@CY1PR0601MB1488.namprd06.prod.outlook.>
Awesome! I’m still modifying this “testing toy” based on the latest Prefer changes, but having you run it against MangoServer would be helpful from both sides. :) http://github.com/bigbluehat/web-annotation-protocol-tester Once my server implementation in WPT matches the Protocol spec a bit more closely—and properly sets up test-run environs—testing Mirador against that would be slick also. Thanks, Rob! Benjamin -- http://bigbluehat.com/ http://linkedin.com/in/benjaminyoung From: Robert Sanderson [mailto:azaroth42@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, June 24, 2016 8:27 PM To: Web Annotation <public-annotation@w3.org> Subject: Client & Server code I took the Mirador codebase (http://projectmirador.org/) and updated from the Open Annotation spec it uses with a custom context, to the current model and protocol. It took about two hours from beginning to end, mostly just tweaking the names of things. I then ran it against my protocol implementation (MangoServer), with a little addition to be able to search by target URI, and it worked as expected. So when we have tests, I have both client and server implementations to submit :) Rob -- Rob Sanderson Semantic Architect The Getty Trust Los Angeles, CA 90049
Received on Monday, 27 June 2016 20:25:31 UTC