- From: gsergiu via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2016 19:47:58 +0000
- To: public-annotation@w3.org
@iherman @BigBlueHat I do understand the reluctance to add new things in the specifications at this stage, and I think that the some things reported here do not necessarily need to be addressed in the specifications of the first version of the standard. However my personal opinion is that there are some things that should be added/enhanced in the first version of the draft: 1. The extension for the targets are likely to happen through selectors and a concrete example is provided. Anyway, I think that the most common case will be the extension of the body to represent domain specific annotations. I strongly believe that an example for extending the body should be included in the vocabulary (whatever usecase the editors think is the easiest to include) 2. The “logical” types of the body are ExternalResource, SpecificResource, BodyValue, TextualBody (embeded text) ... and I think the (embedded) Dataset/StructuredData type is missing here. As it is no time now to add the type in the Specifications, at least a non-normative Note should be added to notify about this possible type. 3. I think the sentence “Deprecate embedded graphs as an explicit part of the model, instead just include or reference a serialized graph.” Must be improved. I’m not sure if I’m correct or not, but I assume that this is related to the SpecificResources and the design decision for the model/vocabulary. a. However, the sentence is hard to be interpreted as so, especially because there is no reference to the “named graphs” in any of the specification documents. b. Is this the official recommendation for the extensions as well? What is the difference between “embedded graph” and “serialized graph”? I assume that a graph needs to be serialized in order to be included, isn’t it so? This means that there is already a sentence, and there is no explanation of what an “embedded graph” and a “serialized graph” means in the context of WA. -- GitHub Notification of comment by gsergiu Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/web-annotation/issues/309#issuecomment-227856077 using your GitHub account
Received on Wednesday, 22 June 2016 19:48:00 UTC