Re: [web-annotation] `account` likely to conflict with foaf:account

@azaroth42 @tilgovi @paolociccarese @iherman do you all remember this 
discussion from January per chance? :wink: Think it's going to trip up
 more than me. I'd vote for either `nickname` (for clarity over 
`nick`) or switching to `alternateName`.

>From [FoaF](
> Property: foaf:nick
> nickname - A short informal nickname characterising an agent 
(includes login identifiers, IRC and other chat nicknames).

(see...they even use `nickname` in the description! :wink: )

>From [](
> An alias for the item.

I'd vote for `nickname` in the JSON-LD replacing `account` and keeping
 the mapping to `foaf:nick` (as `schema:alternateName` seems 
less...committal. :grin: 

@iherman @azaroth42 I'm only not re-opening this as I'm not sure what 
the proper policy/process is in cases like this one. (apologies if I'm
 Doing It Wrong)

GitHub Notification of comment by BigBlueHat
Please view or discuss this issue at
 using your GitHub account

Received on Thursday, 2 June 2016 21:36:04 UTC