public-annotation@w3.org from June 2016 by date

Thursday, 30 June 2016

• Re: [web-annotation] TAG comments (@mnot) Tim Cole via GitHub
• Re: Implementation: Anno4j Raphaël Troncy
• RE: Implementation: Anno4j Benjamin Young
• Re: Implementation: Anno4j Raphaël Troncy

Wednesday, 29 June 2016

• Implementation: Anno4j Benjamin Young

Tuesday, 28 June 2016

• Fun with testing Shane McCarron

Monday, 27 June 2016

• RE: Client & Server code Benjamin Young

Saturday, 25 June 2016

• Re: Client & Server code Ivan Herman
• Client & Server code Robert Sanderson

Friday, 24 June 2016

• Re: [web-annotation] Tweaks for mnot's TAG comments BigBlueHat via GitHub
• Re: [web-annotation] TAG comments (@mnot) Rob Sanderson via GitHub
• [web-annotation] Discuss re-introducing Named Graph resources Rob Sanderson via GitHub
• Re: [web-annotation] Support for embedded structured data (metadata) in the body Rob Sanderson via GitHub
• Closed: [web-annotation] Support for embedded structured data (metadata) in the body Rob Sanderson via GitHub
• Re: [web-annotation] De-normative-ify reference to ldp-paging Rob Sanderson via GitHub
• Closed: [web-annotation] De-normative-ify reference to ldp-paging Rob Sanderson via GitHub
• Re: [web-annotation] Fix example 15 in protocol BigBlueHat via GitHub
• Re: Updated: Agenda for Friday's meeting of the Web Annotation Working Group TB Dinesh
• Meeting minutes, 2016-06-24 Ivan Herman
• [web-annotation] De-normative-ify reference to ldp-paging Rob Sanderson via GitHub
• [web-annotation] TAG comments (@mnot) Rob Sanderson via GitHub
• Re: [Testdev] [model-test] referencing external schema Shane McCarron
• Re: [web-annotation] Fix example 15 in protocol BigBlueHat via GitHub
• Re: [web-annotation] Fix example 15 in protocol BigBlueHat via GitHub
• Re: [web-annotation] "5.1 Create a New Annotation" references using Prefer in response to a creation request BigBlueHat via GitHub
• Closed: [web-annotation] "5.1 Create a New Annotation" references using Prefer in response to a creation request BigBlueHat via GitHub
• Re: Updated: Agenda for Friday's meeting of the Web Annotation Working Group Dan Whaley
• Re: [web-annotation] Fix example 15 in protocol Rob Sanderson via GitHub
• [web-annotation] "5.1 Create a New Annotation" references using Prefer in response to a creation request BigBlueHat via GitHub
• Re: Updated: Agenda for Friday's meeting of the Web Annotation Working Group Ben De Meester
• Re: Updated: Agenda for Friday's meeting of the Web Annotation Working Group Jacob Jett

Thursday, 23 June 2016

• RE: [Testdev] [model-test] referencing external schema Timothy Cole
• Updated: Agenda for Friday's meeting of the Web Annotation Working Group Timothy Cole
• Re: Agenda for Friday's meeting of the Web Annotation Working Group Frederick Hirsch
• Agenda for Friday's meeting of the Web Annotation Working Group Timothy Cole
• Re: [web-annotation] Support for embedded structured data (metadata) in the body Ivan Herman via GitHub

Wednesday, 22 June 2016

• Re: [web-annotation] Which is the relationship between the format and the type of External Web resources? gsergiu via GitHub
• Re: [web-annotation] Which is the relationship between the format and the type of External Web resources? gsergiu via GitHub
• Re: [web-annotation] Support for embedded structured data (metadata) in the body gsergiu via GitHub
• Re: [web-annotation] Support for embedded structured data (metadata) in the body BigBlueHat via GitHub

Tuesday, 21 June 2016

• Re: [web-annotation] Support for embedded structured data (metadata) in the body Ivan Herman via GitHub
• Re: [web-annotation] Support for embedded structured data (metadata) in the body gsergiu via GitHub
• Re: [web-annotation] Support for embedded structured data (metadata) in the body Ivan Herman via GitHub
• Re: [web-annotation] Support for embedded structured data (metadata) in the body gsergiu via GitHub
• Re: [web-annotation] Support for embedded structured data (metadata) in the body gsergiu via GitHub

Monday, 20 June 2016

• Re: [web-annotation] Support for embedded structured data (metadata) in the body Jacob via GitHub
• Re: [web-annotation] Support for embedded structured data (metadata) in the body Rob Sanderson via GitHub
• Re: [web-annotation] Support for embedded structured data (metadata) in the body gsergiu via GitHub
• Re: [web-annotation] Support for embedded structured data (metadata) in the body Ivan Herman via GitHub
• Re: [web-annotation] Which is the relationship between the format and the type of External Web resources? Rob Sanderson via GitHub
• Re: [web-annotation] Link errors in the vocab document Ivan Herman via GitHub
• Closed: [web-annotation] Link errors in the vocab document Ivan Herman via GitHub
• Re: [web-annotation] Support for embedded structured data (metadata) in the body Rob Sanderson via GitHub
• Re: [web-annotation] Link errors in the vocab document Rob Sanderson via GitHub

Friday, 17 June 2016

• Re: [web-annotation] Raphael -> Raphaël Ivan Herman via GitHub
• Re: [web-annotation] Raphael -> Raphaël Raphael Troncy via GitHub
• Re: [web-annotation] Support for embedded structured data (metadata) in the body gsergiu via GitHub
• Re: [web-annotation] Support for embedded structured data (metadata) in the body Ivan Herman via GitHub
• Re: [web-annotation] Support for embedded structured data (metadata) in the body gsergiu via GitHub
• Re: [web-annotation] Support for embedded structured data (metadata) in the body Ivan Herman via GitHub

Thursday, 16 June 2016

• Re: New Web Annotation motivation for (data quality) assessment? Antoine Isaac
• Re: [web-annotation] Support for embedded structured data (metadata) in the body gsergiu via GitHub
• [web-annotation] Support for embedded structured data (metadata) in the body gsergiu via GitHub
• Re: [web-annotation] Which is the relationship between the format and the type of External Web resources? gsergiu via GitHub
• [web-annotation] Which is the relationship between the format and the type of External Web resources? gsergiu via GitHub
• Re: Annotation Model framework submitted to WPT for review Shane McCarron
• [web-annotation] Link errors in the vocab document Ivan Herman via GitHub
• Re: [web-annotation] First round of link checking Ivan Herman via GitHub
• Re: [web-annotation] First round of link checking Rob Sanderson via GitHub
• Closed: [web-annotation] Admin information to be added to the document for CR Ivan Herman via GitHub
• Re: Protocol question: PreferMinimalContainer Robert Sanderson
• Re: Protocol question: PreferMinimalContainer Ivan Herman

Wednesday, 15 June 2016

• RE: Protocol question: PreferMinimalContainer Benjamin Young
• Protocol question: PreferMinimalContainer Benjamin Young
• RE: [web-annotation] 4.1.1 Client Preferences uses `ns/oa` while examples use `ns/ldp` Benjamin Young
• CANCEL this week's Web Anno WG call Tim Cole
• Re: [web-annotation] 4.1.1 Client Preferences uses `ns/oa` while examples use `ns/ldp` Ivan Herman via GitHub

Tuesday, 14 June 2016

• Closed: [web-annotation] 4.1.1 Client Preferences uses `ns/oa` while examples use `ns/ldp` Rob Sanderson via GitHub
• Re: [web-annotation] 4.1.1 Client Preferences uses `ns/oa` while examples use `ns/ldp` Ivan Herman via GitHub
• Re: [web-annotation] 4.1.1 Client Preferences uses `ns/oa` while examples use `ns/ldp` BigBlueHat via GitHub
• [web-annotation] 4.1.1 Client Preferences uses `ns/oa` while examples use `ns/ldp` BigBlueHat via GitHub
• Re: [web-annotation] First round of pubrules' checker changes Ivan Herman via GitHub
• Re: ACTION-33: Where should I put the document? Ivan Herman

Monday, 13 June 2016

• Re: ACTION-33: Where should I put the document? Shane McCarron
• Annotation Model framework submitted to WPT for review Shane McCarron
• Closed: [web-annotation] processingLanguage nitpicks Rob Sanderson via GitHub
• Closed: [web-annotation] content-length in protocol examples are wrong Rob Sanderson via GitHub
• Closed: [web-annotation] (Protocol) Editorial issues about IRI Rob Sanderson via GitHub
• Closed: [web-annotation] Fix "SoftwareAgent" in two examples Rob Sanderson via GitHub
• Closed: [web-annotation] Add a `Collection Response with Contained Description` Rob Sanderson via GitHub
• [web-annotation] content-length in protocol examples are wrong Rob Sanderson via GitHub
• Re: [web-annotation] (Protocol) Editorial issues about IRI Rob Sanderson via GitHub
• Re: [web-annotation] JSON-LD Frames should be dereferenceable ... where? Ivan Herman via GitHub
• Re: [web-annotation] (Protocol) Editorial issues about IRI Takeshi Kanai via GitHub

Sunday, 12 June 2016

• Re: [web-annotation] (Protocol) Editorial issues about IRI Rob Sanderson via GitHub
• Re: [web-annotation] JSON-LD Frames should be dereferenceable ... where? Rob Sanderson via GitHub
• Closed: [web-annotation] Should the fragment specification URLs be https? Rob Sanderson via GitHub
• Re: [web-annotation] Should the fragment specification URLs be https? Rob Sanderson via GitHub

Saturday, 11 June 2016

• Re: [Testdev] [model-test] folder tree -- was: referencing external schema Tim Cole
• Change to the definition of a Assertion List Shane McCarron
• Re: [Testdev] [model-test] folder tree -- was: referencing external schema Shane McCarron
• Re: Sample implementation reports Ivan Herman
• Re: Sample implementation reports Gregg Kellogg
• Re: ACTION-33: Where should I put the document? Ivan Herman
• Re: Sample implementation reports Ivan Herman
• Re: ACTION-33: Where should I put the document? Shane McCarron
• Sample implementation reports Shane McCarron
• Re: ACTION-33: Where should I put the document? Ivan Herman

Friday, 10 June 2016

• Re: ACTION-33: Where should I put the document? Robert Sanderson
• ACTION-33: Where should I put the document? Shane McCarron
• Meeting minutes - 2016-06-10 Ivan Herman
• anno-ACTION-33: Write up drafty test process document for model, server, and clients Web Annotation Working Group Issue Tracker
• [testing - model] Incomplete spreadsheet of tests/schemas Timothy Cole
• RE: Publish Model, Vocab, Protocol as Candidate Recommendations Timothy Cole
• Re: CFC: Publish Model, Vocab, Protocol as Candidate Recommendations Jacob Jett
• Re: CFC: Publish Model, Vocab, Protocol as Candidate Recommendations Paolo Ciccarese
• Re: [web-annotation] Fragment Specification for RDFa Ivan Herman via GitHub
• Re: CFC: Publish Model, Vocab, Protocol as Candidate Recommendations TB Dinesh
• [web-annotation] (Protocol) Editorial issues about IRI Takeshi Kanai via GitHub
• Re: CFC: Publish Model, Vocab, Protocol as Candidate Recommendations Sarven Capadisli
• Re: CFC: Publish Model, Vocab, Protocol as Candidate Recommendations Ben De Meester
• [web-annotation] processingLanguage nitpicks Ben De Meester via GitHub

Thursday, 9 June 2016

• Re: [web-annotation] Should the fragment specification URLs be https? Sarven Capadisli via GitHub
• Re: [web-annotation] Fragment Specification for RDFa Sarven Capadisli via GitHub
• Closed: [web-annotation] Fragment Specification for RDFa Sarven Capadisli via GitHub
• Re: [web-annotation] Should the fragment specification URLs be https? Rob Sanderson via GitHub
• Re: [web-annotation] Fragment Specification for RDFa Rob Sanderson via GitHub
• Re: [web-annotation] Should the fragment specification URLs be https? Ivan Herman via GitHub
• Re: [web-annotation] Fragment Specification for RDFa Ivan Herman via GitHub
• Re: [web-annotation] Should the fragment specification URLs be https? Sarven Capadisli via GitHub
• Re: [web-annotation] Should the fragment specification URLs be https? Ivan Herman via GitHub
• [web-annotation] Should the fragment specification URLs be https? Sarven Capadisli via GitHub
• Re: [Testdev] [model-test] folder tree -- was: referencing external schema Shane McCarron
• RE: [Testdev] [model-test] folder tree -- was: referencing external schema Timothy Cole
• [web-annotation] Fragment Specification for RDFa Sarven Capadisli via GitHub
• Re: [Testdev] [model-test] referencing external schema Shane McCarron
• Re: Agenda for Friday's meeting of the Working Group Jacob Jett
• Agenda for Friday's meeting of the Working Group Timothy Cole
• Re: [web-annotation] Fix "SoftwareAgent" in two examples Rob Sanderson via GitHub
• [web-annotation] Fix "SoftwareAgent" in two examples Hugo Manguinhas via GitHub
• Re: [web-annotation] Admin information to be added to the document for CR Ivan Herman via GitHub

Wednesday, 8 June 2016

• RE: [Testdev] [model-test] referencing external schema Timothy Cole
• Re: [Testdev] [model-test] referencing external schema Shane McCarron
• Re: [web-annotation] Add a `Collection Response with Contained Description` BigBlueHat via GitHub
• Re: [web-annotation] Add a `Collection Response with Contained Description` BigBlueHat via GitHub
• Re: [web-annotation] Line folding in HTTP headers is deprecated as of RFC7230 Rob Sanderson via GitHub
• Re: [web-annotation] Line folding in HTTP headers is deprecated as of RFC7230 Randall Leeds via GitHub
• RE: [Testdev] [model-test] referencing external schema Timothy Cole
• [web-annotation] Add a `Collection Response with Contained Description` BigBlueHat via GitHub
• Re: [web-annotation] Line folding in HTTP headers is deprecated as of RFC7230 BigBlueHat via GitHub
• RE: [Testdev] [model-test] referencing external schema Benjamin Young
• Quick update Shane McCarron
• Re: [web-annotation] Admin information to be added to the document for CR Gregg Kellogg via GitHub
• Re: [web-annotation] Line folding in HTTP headers is deprecated as of RFC7230 Rob Sanderson via GitHub
• Re: CFC: Publish Model, Vocab, Protocol as Candidate Recommendations Robert Sanderson
• AW: Publish Model, Vocab, Protocol as Candidate Recommendations Bailer, Werner
• Re: [Testdev] [model-test] referencing external schema Shane McCarron
• Re: CFC: Publish Model, Vocab, Protocol as Candidate Recommendations Ivan Herman
• Re: CFC: Publish Model, Vocab, Protocol as Candidate Recommendations Shane McCarron
• Re: [web-annotation] Admin information to be added to the document for CR Shane McCarron via GitHub
• Re: [web-annotation] Admin information to be added to the document for CR Ivan Herman via GitHub
• Re: [web-annotation] Admin information to be added to the document for CR Shane McCarron via GitHub
• Cleaning up issues' list Ivan Herman
• Re: [web-annotation] Should Annotation concept and document be distinguished? Ivan Herman via GitHub
• Re: Milestone set up: V1 CR Ivan Herman
• Re: [web-annotation] Including resource previews in annotations Ivan Herman via GitHub
• Milestone set up: V1 CR Ivan Herman
• [web-annotation] Admin information to be added to the document for CR Ivan Herman via GitHub
• Re: [web-annotation] Create SVG versions of diagrams Ivan Herman via GitHub

Tuesday, 7 June 2016

• [web-annotation] Create SVG versions of diagrams Rob Sanderson via GitHub
• Re: [web-annotation] Add diagrams to Vocab examples Rob Sanderson via GitHub
• Closed: [web-annotation] Add diagrams to Vocab examples Rob Sanderson via GitHub
• Re: [web-annotation] Final few examples needed Rob Sanderson via GitHub
• Closed: [web-annotation] Final few examples needed Rob Sanderson via GitHub
• Closed: [web-annotation] Diagram inconsistencies (in pull request #279) Rob Sanderson via GitHub
• Re: [web-annotation] Diagram inconsistencies (in pull request #279) Rob Sanderson via GitHub
• Re: [web-annotation] JSON-LD Frames should be dereferenceable ... where? Ivan Herman via GitHub
• Re: [web-annotation] Yet more diagrams Rob Sanderson via GitHub
• Re: [web-annotation] Diagram inconsistencies (in pull request #279) Paolo Ciccarese via GitHub
• [web-annotation] Diagram inconsistencies (in pull request #279) Paolo Ciccarese via GitHub
• Re: [web-annotation] Final few examples needed Rob Sanderson via GitHub

Monday, 6 June 2016

• Closed: [web-annotation] Examples 6 and 7 and purpose=commenting Rob Sanderson via GitHub
• Closed: [web-annotation] Minor upper/lower case issues Rob Sanderson via GitHub
• Closed: [web-annotation] At-Risk feature must be documented in the status section Rob Sanderson via GitHub
• Closed: [web-annotation] 'Web Resource' not consistent across the document Rob Sanderson via GitHub
• Closed: [web-annotation] Changes' sections should be completed Rob Sanderson via GitHub
• Re: [web-annotation] At Risks, Change Logs Rob Sanderson via GitHub
• Re: [web-annotation] At Risks, Change Logs Rob Sanderson via GitHub
• Re: [web-annotation] 'Web Resource' not consistent across the document Rob Sanderson via GitHub
• Re: [web-annotation] Examples 6 and 7 and purpose=commenting Rob Sanderson via GitHub
• Re: CFC: Publish Model, Vocab, Protocol as Candidate Recommendations Raphaël Troncy
• CFC: Publish Model, Vocab, Protocol as Candidate Recommendations Robert Sanderson
• Re: [web-annotation] Add Accept-Post to subsequent example? BigBlueHat via GitHub
• Re: [web-annotation] Add Accept-Post to subsequent example? Rob Sanderson via GitHub
• Closed: [web-annotation] Add Accept-Post to subsequent example? Rob Sanderson via GitHub
• [web-annotation] Add Accept-Post to subsequent example? BigBlueHat via GitHub
• Re: [web-annotation] JSON-LD Frames should be dereferenceable ... where? Rob Sanderson via GitHub
• Re: [web-annotation] JSON-LD Frames should be dereferenceable ... where? Ivan Herman via GitHub
• Re: [web-annotation] JSON-LD Frames should be dereferenceable ... where? Rob Sanderson via GitHub
• Re: [web-annotation] Normative refs ; change log Rob Sanderson via GitHub
• Closed: [web-annotation] Normative refs ; change log Rob Sanderson via GitHub
• Re: [web-annotation] Update Appendix C (slightly) BigBlueHat via GitHub
• Re: [web-annotation] respec does not correctly highlight turtle examples Ivan Herman via GitHub
• Closed: [web-annotation] respec does not correctly highlight turtle examples Ivan Herman via GitHub
• Re: [web-annotation] Reference to text encoding in spec perhaps not appropriate Martin Dürst via GitHub
• CR transition admin draft Ivan Herman
• [web-annotation] Changes' sections should be completed Ivan Herman via GitHub
• Re: [web-annotation] respec does not correctly highlight turtle examples Ivan Herman via GitHub
• [web-annotation] At-Risk feature must be documented in the status section Ivan Herman via GitHub
• Re: [web-annotation] Add accessibility to the model & vocab Ivan Herman via GitHub
• Re: [web-annotation] Including resource previews in annotations gsergiu via GitHub
• Re: [web-annotation] figures examples 39-44 Ivan Herman via GitHub

Sunday, 5 June 2016

• Re: [web-annotation] figures examples 39-44 Paolo Ciccarese via GitHub
• Re: [web-annotation] respec does not correctly highlight turtle examples Rob Sanderson via GitHub
• [web-annotation] Final few examples needed Rob Sanderson via GitHub
• Re: [web-annotation] figures examples 39-44 Rob Sanderson via GitHub
• Re: [web-annotation] figures examples 39-44 Ivan Herman via GitHub
• Re: [web-annotation] figures examples 39-44 Paolo Ciccarese via GitHub
• Re: [web-annotation] respec does not correctly highlight turtle examples Ivan Herman via GitHub
• Re: [web-annotation] Update index-nametemplate.html Ivan Herman via GitHub
• Re: [web-annotation] figures examples 39-44 Ivan Herman via GitHub
• Re: [web-annotation] figures examples 39-44 Rob Sanderson via GitHub

Saturday, 4 June 2016

• Re: [web-annotation] respec does not correctly highlight turtle examples Shane McCarron via GitHub
• Re: [web-annotation] respec does not correctly highlight turtle examples Rob Sanderson via GitHub
• Re: [web-annotation] respec does not correctly highlight turtle examples Shane McCarron via GitHub
• Re: [web-annotation] respec does not correctly highlight turtle examples Shane McCarron via GitHub
• Re: [web-annotation] respec does not correctly highlight turtle examples Rob Sanderson via GitHub
• Re: [web-annotation] respec does not correctly highlight turtle examples Shane McCarron via GitHub
• [web-annotation] Minor upper/lower case issues Paolo Ciccarese via GitHub
• [web-annotation] Examples 6 and 7 and purpose=commenting Paolo Ciccarese via GitHub
• Re: [web-annotation] respec does not correctly highlight turtle examples Rob Sanderson via GitHub
• Re: [web-annotation] respec highlighting errors Shane McCarron via GitHub
• [web-annotation] 'Web Resource' not consistent across the document Paolo Ciccarese via GitHub
• Re: [web-annotation] respec highlighting errors Rob Sanderson via GitHub
• Re: [web-annotation] protocol testing requirements BigBlueHat via GitHub
• Re: [web-annotation] respec highlighting errors Ivan Herman via GitHub

Friday, 3 June 2016

• [web-annotation] respec highlighting errors Rob Sanderson via GitHub
• Re: [web-annotation] Update Appendix C (slightly) Rob Sanderson via GitHub
• Meeting minutes, 2016-06-03 Ivan Herman
• Closed: [web-annotation] Add pointer to TextualBody to bodyValue Rob Sanderson via GitHub
• Closed: [web-annotation] Remove "and so forth", clarify utf-8 encoding Rob Sanderson via GitHub
• Closed: [web-annotation] Model is defined in terms of IRIs; Protocol with URI Rob Sanderson via GitHub
• Closed: [web-annotation] Add accessibility to the model & vocab Rob Sanderson via GitHub
• Closed: [web-annotation] Data type, cardinality questions, typos Rob Sanderson via GitHub
• Closed: [web-annotation] Add a recommendation for HTTPS into the protocol spec Rob Sanderson via GitHub
• Closed: [web-annotation] white space normalisation Rob Sanderson via GitHub
• Closed: [web-annotation] Normalisation of Text Quote Selector Rob Sanderson via GitHub
• Closed: [web-annotation] Use of dc:language Rob Sanderson via GitHub
• Closed: [web-annotation] 'generated' and 'modified' should use UTC by default Rob Sanderson via GitHub
• Closed: [web-annotation] Deref of namespace should go to vocab? Rob Sanderson via GitHub
• Closed: [web-annotation] Status code requirements should be in the sections of Protocol Rob Sanderson via GitHub
• Closed: [web-annotation] Base direction for annotations Rob Sanderson via GitHub
• Closed: [web-annotation] TimeState, generated, and modified should recommend all values use UTC Rob Sanderson via GitHub
• Closed: [web-annotation] Model Typos Rob Sanderson via GitHub
• Closed: [web-annotation] Minor issues with the individuals' formatting in the vocab spec Rob Sanderson via GitHub
• Closed: [web-annotation] exactly 0 or 1 language(s) Rob Sanderson via GitHub
• Closed: [web-annotation] (model) vague definition of character position for text position selector Rob Sanderson via GitHub
• Closed: [web-annotation] Explain extending spec with new classes, esp Selectors Rob Sanderson via GitHub
• Closed: [web-annotation] Model should allow multiple Selectors per SpecificResource Rob Sanderson via GitHub
• Closed: [web-annotation] Request header and language negotiation Rob Sanderson via GitHub
• Closed: [web-annotation] (model) have a note on logical and visual order of text for text quote selector implementations Rob Sanderson via GitHub
• Closed: [web-annotation] Can I refine a state via a selector? Rob Sanderson via GitHub
• Closed: [web-annotation] Should oa:start / oa:end be xsd:nonNegativeInteger or xsd:integer ? Rob Sanderson via GitHub
• Closed: [web-annotation] Consistent definitions of the id for External Web Resources and Specific Resources Rob Sanderson via GitHub
• Re: [web-annotation] Consistent definitions of the id for External Web Resources and Specific Resources Rob Sanderson via GitHub
• Re: [web-annotation] Consistent definitions of the id for External Web Resources and Specific Resources Ivan Herman via GitHub
• Re: [web-annotation] Including resource previews in annotations Ivan Herman via GitHub
• Closed: [web-annotation] Change 'reviewing' to 'assessing'? Ivan Herman via GitHub
• Re: [web-annotation] Including resource previews in annotations Rob Sanderson via GitHub
• Re: [web-annotation] Reference to text encoding in spec perhaps not appropriate Ivan Herman via GitHub
• Re: [web-annotation] Delete extraneous / unused content Ivan Herman via GitHub
• Re: [web-annotation] Including resource previews in annotations Ivan Herman via GitHub
• Re: Friday's Agenda for the Web Annotation Working Group - 3 June at 11 AM Eastern (US) Dan Whaley
• Re: [web-annotation] Including resource previews in annotations gsergiu via GitHub
• Re: [web-annotation] Including resource previews in annotations Ivan Herman via GitHub
• [web-annotation] Including resource previews in annotations gsergiu via GitHub
• Re: Friday's Agenda for the Web Annotation Working Group - 3 June at 11 AM Eastern (US) Ben De Meester
• Re: [web-annotation] typo in Protocol: rdf:label Ivan Herman via GitHub
• Re: [web-annotation] `account` likely to conflict with foaf:account Ivan Herman via GitHub
• Re: [web-annotation] Delete extraneous / unused content Ivan Herman via GitHub

Thursday, 2 June 2016

• Re: [web-annotation] `account` likely to conflict with foaf:account BigBlueHat via GitHub
• Re: [web-annotation] Delete extraneous / unused content BigBlueHat via GitHub
• Friday's Agenda for the Web Annotation Working Group - 3 June at 11 AM Eastern (US) Timothy Cole
• Re: [web-annotation] Delete extraneous / unused content BigBlueHat via GitHub
• Re: [web-annotation] typo in Protocol: rdf:label BigBlueHat via GitHub
• Re: [web-annotation] typo in Protocol: rdf:label Rob Sanderson via GitHub
• Re: [web-annotation] typo in Protocol: rdf:label BigBlueHat via GitHub
• Re: [web-annotation] typo in Protocol: rdf:label BigBlueHat via GitHub
• Re: [web-annotation] Reference to text encoding in spec perhaps not appropriate aphillips via GitHub
• Re: [web-annotation] Consistent definitions of the id for External Web Resources and Specific Resources gsergiu via GitHub
• Re: [web-annotation] Consistent definitions of the id for External Web Resources and Specific Resources Rob Sanderson via GitHub
• [model-test] referencing external schema Timothy Cole
• Re: [web-annotation] Remove purpose=commenting requirement from bodyValue Hugo Manguinhas via GitHub
• Re: [web-annotation] Reference to text encoding in spec perhaps not appropriate r12a via GitHub
• Re: [web-annotation] Consistent definitions of the id for External Web Resources and Specific Resources gsergiu via GitHub

Wednesday, 1 June 2016

• Re: [web-annotation] Reference to text encoding in spec perhaps not appropriate Rob Sanderson via GitHub
• Re: [web-annotation] Consistent definitions of the id for External Web Resources and Specific Resources Rob Sanderson via GitHub
• Re: [web-annotation] Consistent definitions of the id for External Web Resources and Specific Resources gsergiu via GitHub
• Re: [web-annotation] Consistent definitions of the id for External Web Resources and Specific Resources Rob Sanderson via GitHub
• Re: [web-annotation] Consistent definitions of the id for External Web Resources and Specific Resources gsergiu via GitHub
• Re: [web-annotation] Remove purpose=commenting requirement from bodyValue BigBlueHat via GitHub
• Re: [web-annotation] Reference to text encoding in spec perhaps not appropriate Randall Leeds via GitHub
• Re: [web-annotation] Reference to text encoding in spec perhaps not appropriate r12a via GitHub
• Re: [web-annotation] Reference to text encoding in spec perhaps not appropriate Randall Leeds via GitHub
• Re: [web-annotation] Reference to text encoding in spec perhaps not appropriate aphillips via GitHub
• Re: [web-annotation] Reference to text encoding in spec perhaps not appropriate Ivan Herman via GitHub
• Re: [web-annotation] Reference to text encoding in spec perhaps not appropriate Randall Leeds via GitHub
• Re: [web-annotation] Reference to text encoding in spec perhaps not appropriate Ivan Herman via GitHub
• Re: [web-annotation] Reference to text encoding in spec perhaps not appropriate Randall Leeds via GitHub
• Re: [web-annotation] Consistent definitions of the id for External Web Resources and Specific Resources Ivan Herman via GitHub
• Re: [web-annotation] Reference to text encoding in spec perhaps not appropriate Rob Sanderson via GitHub
• Re: [web-annotation] Consistent definitions of the id for External Web Resources and Specific Resources Rob Sanderson via GitHub
• [web-annotation] Track alignment between motivations and other ontologies Rob Sanderson via GitHub
• Re: [web-annotation] Relationship between Motivations and Actions (from schema.org) Rob Sanderson via GitHub
• Closed: [web-annotation] Relationship between Motivations and Actions (from schema.org) Rob Sanderson via GitHub
• Re: [web-annotation] Reference to text encoding in spec perhaps not appropriate Randall Leeds via GitHub
• Re: New Web Annotation motivation for (data quality) assessment? Robert Sanderson
• Re: [web-annotation] Remove purpose=commenting requirement from bodyValue Rob Sanderson via GitHub
• Re: New Web Annotation motivation for (data quality) assessment? Antoine Isaac
• Re: Annotations with RDF statements Antoine Isaac
• Re: [web-annotation] Remove purpose=commenting requirement from bodyValue Hugo Manguinhas via GitHub
• Re: New Web Annotation motivation for (data quality) assessment? Ivan Herman
• Re: Annotations with RDF statements Ivan Herman
• Re: [web-annotation] Reference to text encoding in spec perhaps not appropriate Ivan Herman via GitHub
• Re: New Web Annotation motivation for (data quality) assessment? Antoine Isaac
• Re: Annotations with RDF statements Antoine Isaac
• Re: [web-annotation] Reference to text encoding in spec perhaps not appropriate r12a via GitHub
• Re: [web-annotation] Reference to text encoding in spec perhaps not appropriate Ivan Herman via GitHub
• Re: [web-annotation] Reference to text encoding in spec perhaps not appropriate r12a via GitHub
• Re: [web-annotation] Reference to text encoding in spec perhaps not appropriate r12a via GitHub
• Re: [web-annotation] Model Typos Raphael Troncy via GitHub
• Re: [web-annotation] Model Typos Ivan Herman via GitHub
• Re: [web-annotation] Reference to text encoding in spec perhaps not appropriate Felix Sasaki via GitHub

Last message date: Thursday, 30 June 2016 14:49:06 UTC