- From: gsergiu via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2016 09:28:00 +0000
- To: public-annotation@w3.org
@iherman yes, you are rigth, I'm analyzing the issue in a larger context. But there are still smaller issue closely related to the current version of the standard: 1. Could we add an example of extensions for the body? 2. Could this example use the "type":"Dataset"? I think that embeded Dataset is quite a common/important usecase which is probably supported by the current specifications, but there is no example of not making it explicit 3. There is only one mention of the named graphs in the stadard, is the following recommendation still standing, especially in the context of extensions? `Deprecate embedded graphs as an explicit part of the model, instead just include or reference a serialized graph.` -- GitHub Notification of comment by gsergiu Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/web-annotation/issues/309#issuecomment-227387975 using your GitHub account
Received on Tuesday, 21 June 2016 09:28:09 UTC