- From: gsergiu via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2016 20:46:02 +0000
- To: public-annotation@w3.org
So ... my conclusions: 1. The explanation of the classes needs improvement (in V1)! 2. By reading the specifications in comparison with TextualBody and SpecificResource, I would expect that the implicit class o external resources should be ExternalResource. In order to be consistent with the definition of the External Resources, I suggest to change the definition of the type in classes section , by replacing: "The type of the Body or Target resource" with "The type of the External Resources's content (in Body or Target)" This will become consistent with the languagve and format references in the definition of the external resource: > Web Resources are identified with a IRI and have various properties, often including a format or language for the resource's content. -- GitHub Notification of comment by gsergiu Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/web-annotation/issues/308#issuecomment-227871119 using your GitHub account
Received on Wednesday, 22 June 2016 20:46:05 UTC