- From: Ivan Herman via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 03 Jun 2016 14:38:03 +0000
- To: public-annotation@w3.org
> On 3 Jun 2016, at 11:41, gsergiu <notifications@github.com> wrote: > > I understand your concerns on the CR. However, my claim is that this is a "mandatory" functionality for implementations. This means, that each implementation will need to extend the annotation serialization in a way that is not standardized. > All implementations have to do something like that. Correct. But there is not necessarily a need for having an interoperability around this feature; it may be the point where implementations compete. I say *may*, because that is an issue where it would take some time finding a consensus on. > I don’t know if a compromise solution can be adopted, by adding a non-normative annex in the standard, or a reference to long living document in which the community can address open issues and propose/discuss solutions. I think this would be benefic both for community and the V2 of the standard > > Having a living document, in more general manner, on implementation experiences and possible V2 features is a good idea in any case. We will have to have a discussion, when the time comes, to set up some sort of a 'life after Rec' mechanism exactly for these purposes. This is a clear possible topic. But, for *now*, I would propose to set this issue as postponed. -- GitHub Notification of comment by iherman Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/web-annotation/issues/257#issuecomment-223596662 using your GitHub account
Received on Friday, 3 June 2016 14:38:05 UTC