public-annotation@w3.org from June 2015 by date

Tuesday, 30 June 2015

Re: [web-annotation] Is fixing the list of fragment identifiers a good idea? BigBlueHat via GitHub
Re: [web-annotation] Is fixing the list of fragment identifiers a good idea? Ivan Herman via GitHub
Re: [web-annotation] Is fixing the list of fragment identifiers a good idea? Ivan Herman via GitHub
Re: [web-annotation] Is fixing the list of fragment identifiers a good idea? Benjamin Young
[note] WebPlatform Specs Notes Archiver

Monday, 29 June 2015

[admin] Canceled Teleconference this week - no call 1 July Frederick Hirsch
[note] Web Annotation Data Model WebPlatform Specs Notes Archiver

Saturday, 27 June 2015

Re: [web-annotation] Is fixing the list of fragment identifiers a good idea? Ivan Herman via GitHub

Friday, 26 June 2015

CfC: publish FPWD of Web Annotation Protocol; concluded with support Frederick Hirsch
Re: [model] Proposal: Allow motivatedBy on SpecificResource Ivan Herman
Re: [model] Proposal: Allow motivatedBy on SpecificResource Ivan Herman

Thursday, 25 June 2015

RE: [model] Proposal: Allow motivatedBy on SpecificResource Salisbury, Davis - Hoboken
Re: [web-annotation] Is fixing the list of fragment identifiers a good idea? Rob Sanderson via GitHub
Re: [web-annotation] Is fixing the list of fragment identifiers a good idea? Paolo Ciccarese via GitHub
Re: [model] Proposal: Allow motivatedBy on SpecificResource Robert Sanderson
Re: [web-annotation] Is fixing the list of fragment identifiers a good idea? Jacob via GitHub
Re: [web-annotation] Is fixing the list of fragment identifiers a good idea? BillKasdorf via GitHub
Re: [model] Proposal: Allow motivatedBy on SpecificResource Paolo Ciccarese
[web-annotation] Is fixing the list of fragment identifiers a good idea? Ivan Herman via GitHub
Re: [model] Proposal: Allow motivatedBy on SpecificResource Ivan Herman
Re: [model] Proposal: Allow motivatedBy on SpecificResource Ivan Herman
Re: [model] Proposal: Allow motivatedBy on SpecificResource Ivan Herman
[note] Web Annotation Data Model WebPlatform Specs Notes Archiver
[note] Web Annotation Data Model WebPlatform Specs Notes Archiver
Re: [model] Proposal: Allow motivatedBy on SpecificResource Robert Sanderson
Re: [model] Proposal: Allow motivatedBy on SpecificResource Doug Schepers

Wednesday, 24 June 2015

[testing] Sparql based model validation Robert Sanderson
Re: [model] Proposal: Allow motivatedBy on SpecificResource Robert Sanderson
Re: [model] Proposal: Allow motivatedBy on SpecificResource Paolo Ciccarese
Re: [model] Proposal: Allow motivatedBy on SpecificResource Robert Sanderson
Re: [model] Proposal: Allow motivatedBy on SpecificResource Robert Sanderson
Re: [model] Proposal: Allow motivatedBy on SpecificResource Paolo Ciccarese
Re: [model] Proposal: Allow motivatedBy on SpecificResource Paolo Ciccarese
Re: [model] Proposal: Allow motivatedBy on SpecificResource Doug Schepers
Re: [model] Proposal: Allow motivatedBy on SpecificResource Paolo Ciccarese
Re: [model] Proposal: Allow motivatedBy on SpecificResource Robert Sanderson
Re: [model] Proposal: Allow motivatedBy on SpecificResource Robert Sanderson
Re: [web-annotation] Should all responses have the anno json-ld profile? Paolo Ciccarese via GitHub
Re: TPAC Double-Booking Doug Schepers
Re: TPAC Double-Booking Robert Sanderson
Re: [web-annotation] Should all responses have the anno json-ld profile? Chris Birk via GitHub
Re: TPAC Double-Booking Ivan Herman
TPAC Double-Booking Doug Schepers
Meeting minutes, 2015-06-24... Ivan Herman
Re: [web-annotation] TLDR prevention at beginning? of Protocol Ivan Herman via GitHub
Re: [web-annotation] TLDR prevention at beginning? of Protocol Paolo Ciccarese via GitHub
Re: [web-annotation] TLDR prevention at beginning? of Protocol via GitHub
Re: [web-annotation] Should all responses have the anno json-ld profile? via GitHub
anno-ACTION-21: Discuss testing and use of java vs python on ldp call Web Annotation Working Group Issue Tracker
RE: Agenda: Web Annotation Teleconference 24 June 2015 Bill Kasdorf
Re: Agenda: Web Annotation Teleconference 24 June 2015 Jacob Jett
RE: Agenda: Web Annotation Teleconference 24 June 2015 Denenberg, Ray
Re: Chasing the Copy-Edit Use Case annotation Jacob Jett
Re: [model] Proposal: Allow motivatedBy on SpecificResource Paolo Ciccarese
Chasing the Copy-Edit Use Case annotation TB Dinesh
Re: [model] Proposal: Allow motivatedBy on SpecificResource Ivan Herman
Re: JSON Serialization? Ivan Herman
Re: JSON Serialization? Ivan Herman
Re: JSON Serialization? Doug Schepers

Tuesday, 23 June 2015

Re: [model] Proposal: Allow motivatedBy on SpecificResource Doug Schepers
Re: [model] Proposal: Allow motivatedBy on SpecificResource Doug Schepers
Re: [model] Proposal: Allow motivatedBy on SpecificResource Paolo Ciccarese
Re: [model] Proposal: Allow motivatedBy on SpecificResource Doug Schepers
Re: [model] Proposal: Allow motivatedBy on SpecificResource Doug Schepers
Re: [model] Proposal: Allow motivatedBy on SpecificResource Chris Birk
Re: [model] Proposal: Allow motivatedBy on SpecificResource Paolo Ciccarese
Re: [model] Proposal: Allow motivatedBy on SpecificResource Jacob Jett
Re: Reported to Social Web WG Randall Leeds
Re: [model] Proposal: Allow motivatedBy on SpecificResource Robert Sanderson
Re: [model] Proposal: Allow motivatedBy on SpecificResource Chris Birk
Reported to Social Web WG Doug Schepers
Re: JSON Serialization? Randall Leeds
Re: [model] Proposal: Allow motivatedBy on SpecificResource Doug Schepers
Re: JSON Serialization? Ivan Herman
Re: JSON Serialization? Robert Sanderson
Re: JSON Serialization? Ivan Herman
Re: JSON Serialization? Doug Schepers

Monday, 22 June 2015

Re: JSON Serialization? Robert Sanderson
Agenda: Web Annotation Teleconference 24 June 2015 Frederick Hirsch
Re: JSON Serialization? Jacob Jett
Re: JSON Serialization? Doug Schepers
Re: Agenda +Testing Paolo Ciccarese
Re: JSON Serialization? Jacob Jett
Re: Agenda +Testing Doug Schepers
Re: JSON Serialization? Doug Schepers
Re: Agenda +Testing Frederick Hirsch
Re: JSON Serialization? Robert Sanderson
Agenda +Testing Chris Birk
Re: JSON Serialization? Frederick Hirsch
Re: CfC: publish FPWD of Web Annotation Protocol; respond by 25 June 2015 Ben De Meester
Re: [model] Proposal: Allow motivatedBy on SpecificResource Paolo Ciccarese

Sunday, 21 June 2015

Re: [model] Modeling a Tweet: Tags Jacob Jett
Re: [model] Proposal: Allow motivatedBy on SpecificResource Robert Sanderson
Re: [model] Proposal: Allow motivatedBy on SpecificResource Jacob Jett
Re: [model] Proposal: Allow motivatedBy on SpecificResource Ivan Herman

Saturday, 20 June 2015

Re: [model] Why Motivations cannot be on Bodies Ivan Herman

Friday, 19 June 2015

RE: client/server model Denenberg, Ray
Re: [web-annotation] TLDR prevention at beginning? of Protocol Chris Birk via GitHub
RE: [model] Proposal: Allow motivatedBy on SpecificResource Timothy Cole
Re: [web-annotation] Should all responses have the anno json-ld profile? Ivan Herman via GitHub
Re: [model] Proposal: Allow motivatedBy on SpecificResource Robert Sanderson
RE: [model] Proposal: Allow motivatedBy on SpecificResource Timothy Cole
Re: [web-annotation] Annotation Containers should permit non- ldp:BasicContainer Ivan Herman via GitHub
Re: [model] Proposal: Allow motivatedBy on SpecificResource Jacob Jett
Re: [model] Proposal: Allow motivatedBy on SpecificResource Robert Sanderson
RE: [model] Proposal: Allow motivatedBy on SpecificResource Timothy Cole
Re: [web-annotation] Annotation Containers should permit non- ldp:BasicContainer Rob Sanderson via GitHub
Re: Annotate an image fragment inside a html page Olivier Aubert
Re: [web-annotation] Annotation Containers should permit non- ldp:BasicContainer Ivan Herman via GitHub
Re: [web-annotation] Annotation Containers should permit non- ldp:BasicContainer Ivan Herman via GitHub

Thursday, 18 June 2015

Re: Annotate an image fragment inside a html page Doug Schepers
Re: Updated Protocol draft available Robert Sanderson
Re: Updated Protocol draft available Ed Summers
Re: [model] Modeling a Tweet: Tags Doug Schepers
Re: CfC: publish FPWD of Web Annotation Protocol; respond by 25 June 2015 Robert Sanderson
Re: [web-annotation] Should all responses have the anno json-ld profile? Rob Sanderson via GitHub
Re: [web-annotation] Should all responses have the anno json-ld profile? Randall Leeds via GitHub
[web-annotation] Should all responses have the anno json-ld profile? Rob Sanderson via GitHub
Re: Updated Protocol draft available Robert Sanderson
RE: [model] Why Motivations cannot be on Bodies Denenberg, Ray
Re: [model] Why Motivations cannot be on Bodies Paolo Ciccarese
Re: [model] Why Motivations cannot be on Bodies Robert Sanderson
Re: [model] Modeling a Tweet: Tags Jacob Jett
Re: [web-annotation] JSON-LD contexts for Model/Protocol Randall Leeds via GitHub
Re: [web-annotation] TLDR prevention at beginning? of Protocol Randall Leeds via GitHub
Re: [model] Modeling a Tweet: Tags Randall Leeds
Re: [model] Modeling a Tweet: Tags Doug Schepers
Re: [model] Modeling a Tweet: Tags Doug Schepers
Re: [model] Modeling a Tweet: Tags Jacob Jett
Re: Updated Protocol draft available Ivan Herman
Re: [model] Modeling a Tweet: Tags Randall Leeds
Re: [web-annotation] TLDR prevention at beginning? of Protocol Ivan Herman via GitHub
Re: [model] Modeling a Tweet: Tags Jacob Jett
Re: [web-annotation] JSON-LD contexts for Model/Protocol Ivan Herman via GitHub
Re: [model] Modeling a Tweet: Tags Chris Birk
Re: [model] Modeling a Tweet: Tags Randall Leeds
Re: [model] Modeling a Tweet: Tags Randall Leeds
Re: [model] Modeling a Tweet: Tags Robert Sanderson
Re: [model] Modeling a Tweet: Tags Randall Leeds
Re: [model] Why Motivations cannot be on Bodies Doug Schepers
Re: Updated Protocol draft available Robert Sanderson
Re: [model] Modeling a Tweet: Tags Randall Leeds
[web-annotation] TLDR prevention at beginning? of Protocol Rob Sanderson via GitHub
RE: [model] Proposal: Allow motivatedBy on SpecificResource Salisbury, Davis - Hoboken
[web-annotation] Annotation Containers should permit non- ldp:BasicContainer Rob Sanderson via GitHub
Re: CfC: publish FPWD of Web Annotation Protocol; respond by 25 June 2015 Doug Schepers
[web-annotation] JSON-LD contexts for Model/Protocol Rob Sanderson via GitHub
[web-annotation] JSON-LD Profile: Where? Rob Sanderson via GitHub
[web-annotation] Make Turtle support optional? Rob Sanderson via GitHub
[model] Why Motivations cannot be on Bodies Robert Sanderson
Re: [web-annotation] Multiple JSON-LD Contexts Rob Sanderson via GitHub
Closed: [web-annotation] Multiple JSON-LD Contexts Rob Sanderson via GitHub
Re: [web-annotation] Non-Annotation Containers not in scope for Protocol Rob Sanderson via GitHub
Closed: [web-annotation] Non-Annotation Containers not in scope for Protocol Rob Sanderson via GitHub
Re: [model] Modeling a Tweet: Tags Doug Schepers
Re: [model] Proposal: Allow motivatedBy on SpecificResource Randall Leeds
RE: [model] Proposal: Allow motivatedBy on SpecificResource Salisbury, Davis - Hoboken
Re: [model] Proposal: Allow motivatedBy on SpecificResource Robert Sanderson
Re: CfC: publish FPWD of Web Annotation Protocol; respond by 25 June 2015 Chris Birk
Re: [model] Proposal: Allow motivatedBy on SpecificResource Chris Birk
Re: Fwd: JSON Serialization? Robert Sanderson
Re: Fwd: JSON Serialization? Chris Birk
RE: [model] Proposal: Allow motivatedBy on SpecificResource Denenberg, Ray
Re: [model] Proposal: Allow motivatedBy on SpecificResource Jacob Jett
Re: Draft Minutes 17 June 2015 Annotation WG teleconference Ivan Herman
RE: [model] Proposal: Allow motivatedBy on SpecificResource Denenberg, Ray
Re: CfC: publish FPWD of Web Annotation Protocol; respond by 25 June 2015 Ivan Herman
Re: [model] Modeling a Tweet: Tags TB Dinesh
CfC: publish FPWD of Web Annotation Protocol; respond by 25 June 2015 Frederick Hirsch

Wednesday, 17 June 2015

RE: [model] Proposal: Allow motivatedBy on SpecificResource Chris Birk

Thursday, 18 June 2015

Re: Updated Protocol draft available Ivan Herman
Re: Updated Protocol draft available Doug Schepers
Re: Updated Protocol draft available Ivan Herman
[model] Modeling a Tweet: Tags Doug Schepers
Re: [model] Proposal: Allow motivatedBy on SpecificResource Doug Schepers
Re: Fwd: JSON Serialization? Doug Schepers
Re: JSON Serialization? Ivan Herman
Fwd: JSON Serialization? Randall Leeds
Re: client/server model Doug Schepers
Updated Protocol draft available Robert Sanderson

Wednesday, 17 June 2015

Re: JSON Serialization? Ivan Herman
RE: [model] Proposal: Allow motivatedBy on SpecificResource Timothy Cole
Draft Minutes 17 June 2015 Annotation WG teleconference Frederick Hirsch
RE: client/server model Denenberg, Ray
RE: JSON-LD & N3 - Re: CfC: Resolution Annotation Protocol to make JSON-LD default returned if no HTTP Accept request header (deadline 24 June 2015) Svensson, Lars
JSON Serialization? Doug Schepers
Re: JSON-LD & N3 - Re: CfC: Resolution Annotation Protocol to make JSON-LD default returned if no HTTP Accept request header (deadline 24 June 2015) Henry Story
Re: client/server model Doug Schepers

Tuesday, 16 June 2015

Re: The Copy-Edit Use Case Jacob Jett
[model] Proposal: Allow motivatedBy on SpecificResource Robert Sanderson
RE: The Copy-Edit Use Case Siegman, Tzviya - Hoboken
Re: The Copy-Edit Use Case Robert Sanderson
RE: The Copy-Edit Use Case Salisbury, Davis - Hoboken
Re: The Copy-Edit Use Case Doug Schepers
Re: The Copy-Edit Use Case Doug Schepers
RE: The Copy-Edit Use Case Salisbury, Davis - Hoboken
RE: The Copy-Edit Use Case Salisbury, Davis - Hoboken
Re: client/server model Robert Sanderson
Re: Activity Streams and Annotations Benjamin Young
RE: client/server model Denenberg, Ray
Re: CfC: Resolution Annotation Protocol to make JSON-LD default returned if no HTTP Accept request header (deadline 24 June 2015) Ivan Herman
Re: CfC: Resolution Annotation Protocol to make JSON-LD default returned if no HTTP Accept request header (deadline 24 June 2015) Henry Story

Monday, 15 June 2015

Re: client/server model Robert Sanderson
Re: CfC: Resolution Annotation Protocol to make JSON-LD default returned if no HTTP Accept request header (deadline 24 June 2015) Frederick Hirsch
Re: CfC: Resolution Annotation Protocol to make JSON-LD default returned if no HTTP Accept request header (deadline 24 June 2015) Frederick Hirsch
Re: client/server model Robert Sanderson
Re: JSON-LD & N3 - Re: CfC: Resolution Annotation Protocol to make JSON-LD default returned if no HTTP Accept request header (deadline 24 June 2015) Frederick Hirsch
RE: client/server model Denenberg, Ray
Re: JSON-LD & N3 - Re: CfC: Resolution Annotation Protocol to make JSON-LD default returned if no HTTP Accept request header (deadline 24 June 2015) Robert Sanderson
Re: client/server model Robert Sanderson
client/server model Denenberg, Ray
Re: CfC: Resolution Annotation Protocol to make JSON-LD default returned if no HTTP Accept request header (deadline 24 June 2015) Randall Leeds
Re: CfC: Resolution Annotation Protocol to make JSON-LD default returned if no HTTP Accept request header (deadline 24 June 2015) Henry Story
RE: JSON-LD & N3 - Re: CfC: Resolution Annotation Protocol to make JSON-LD default returned if no HTTP Accept request header (deadline 24 June 2015) Svensson, Lars
RE: JSON-LD & N3 - Re: CfC: Resolution Annotation Protocol to make JSON-LD default returned if no HTTP Accept request header (deadline 24 June 2015) Svensson, Lars
The Copy-Edit Use Case Doug Schepers

Saturday, 13 June 2015

Re: [protocol] Authentication Robert Sanderson
Re: JSON-LD & N3 Robert Sanderson
Re: CfC: Resolution Annotation Protocol to make JSON-LD default returned if no HTTP Accept request header (deadline 24 June 2015) Doug Schepers
Re: JSON-LD & N3 Doug Schepers
Re: CfC: Resolution Annotation Protocol to make JSON-LD default returned if no HTTP Accept request header (deadline 24 June 2015) Ivan Herman
Re: Agenda: Teleconference 17 June 2015 Ivan Herman
Re: JSON-LD & N3 - Re: CfC: Resolution Annotation Protocol to make JSON-LD default returned if no HTTP Accept request header (deadline 24 June 2015) Ivan Herman
Re: JSON-LD & N3 - Re: CfC: Resolution Annotation Protocol to make JSON-LD default returned if no HTTP Accept request header (deadline 24 June 2015) Henry Story
Re: JSON-LD & N3 - Re: CfC: Resolution Annotation Protocol to make JSON-LD default returned if no HTTP Accept request header (deadline 24 June 2015) David Booth
Re: Resolution to defer Patch work Ivan Herman

Friday, 12 June 2015

Thursday, 11 June 2015

Wednesday, 10 June 2015

Fwd: [wbs] response to 'TR Design Survey' Frederick Hirsch
Re: CfC: Resolution Annotation Protocol to make JSON-LD default returned if no HTTP Accept request header (deadline 24 June 2015) Cody Burleson
Re: CfC: Resolution Annotation Protocol to make JSON-LD default returned if no HTTP Accept request header (deadline 24 June 2015) Randall Leeds
Re: CfC: Resolution Annotation Protocol to make JSON-LD default returned if no HTTP Accept request header (deadline 24 June 2015) David Wood
TPAC 2015 Registration Now Open Frederick Hirsch
Re: CfC: Resolution Annotation Protocol to make JSON-LD default returned if no HTTP Accept request header (deadline 24 June 2015) Robert Sanderson
Resolution to defer Patch work Frederick Hirsch
CfC: Resolution Annotation Protocol to make JSON-LD default returned if no HTTP Accept request header (deadline 24 June 2015) Frederick Hirsch
Re: Turtle Trouble (was: Re: [protocol] Patch formats) Robert Sanderson
Re: Turtle Trouble Stian Soiland-Reyes
Re: Turtle Trouble Robert Casties
anno-ACTION-20: Follow up on json-ld resolution Web Annotation Working Group Issue Tracker
Re: [protocol] Authentication Paolo Ciccarese
Re: Turtle Trouble (was: Re: [protocol] Patch formats) Stian Soiland-Reyes
(Updated) Agenda Teleconference 10 June 2015 (v2) Frederick Hirsch
Re: Turtle Trouble (was: Re: [protocol] Patch formats) Benjamin Young
Re: Educational Publishing Use Case Frederick Hirsch
Re: Turtle Trouble (was: Re: [protocol] Patch formats) Stian Soiland-Reyes
Re: Turtle Trouble (was: Re: [protocol] Patch formats) Ivan Herman
Re: Turtle Trouble (was: Re: [protocol] Patch formats) Stian Soiland-Reyes
Re: Turtle Trouble (was: Re: [protocol] Patch formats) Ivan Herman
Re: Turtle Trouble (was: Re: [protocol] Patch formats) Ivan Herman

Tuesday, 9 June 2015

Agenda Teleconference 10 June 2015 Frederick Hirsch
Re: Turtle Trouble (was: Re: [protocol] Patch formats) Robert Casties

Monday, 8 June 2015

Re: [protocol] Authentication Randall Leeds
Re: Turtle Trouble (was: Re: [protocol] Patch formats) Benjamin Young
Re: Turtle Trouble (was: Re: [protocol] Patch formats) Ivan Herman
Re: [protocol] Authentication Susanna Netseven
Turtle Trouble (was: Re: [protocol] Patch formats) Benjamin Young

Saturday, 6 June 2015

Re: Body as Named graph Ivan Herman
Re: [protocol] Patch formats Ivan Herman

Friday, 5 June 2015

[protocol] Authentication Robert Sanderson
Re: Question about body and motivatedBy Paolo Ciccarese
[protocol] Patch formats Robert Sanderson
Re: Question about body and motivatedBy Paolo Ciccarese
Re: Question about body and motivatedBy Robert Sanderson
Re: Draft Protocol question -- Creating a child basic container for annotations Robert Sanderson
Re: Body as Named graph Robert Sanderson

Thursday, 4 June 2015

Re: Annotation meeting minutes - 2015-06-03 Doug Schepers

Wednesday, 3 June 2015

Annotation meeting minutes - 2015-06-03 Ivan Herman
RE: Draft Protocol question -- Creating a child basic container for annotations Timothy Cole
Educational Publishing Use Case Swenson, Kyrce
Body as Named graph Giulio Andreini

Tuesday, 2 June 2015

Re: Draft Protocol question -- Creating a child basic container for annotations Robert Sanderson
Draft Protocol question -- Creating a child basic container for annotations Timothy Cole
[admin] Teleconference Agenda 3 June 2015 Robert Sanderson

Last message date: Tuesday, 30 June 2015 16:50:57 UTC