Re: client/server model

Hi, Ray–

Well, I suppose you and I won't agree about the goals of this working 
group, but apart from that, do you have a reaction to the more 
substantive parts of my email, regarding Web Annotation architecture, 
clients, and servers?

Regards–
–Doug

On 6/17/15 10:23 AM, Denenberg, Ray wrote:
> From: Doug Schepers [mailto:schepers@w3.org]
>
>
>> I'm assuming you really meant to say something like, "For the
>> purposes of my immediate goal, let's temporarily set aside the
>> details of conformance and establish a common annotation processing
>> model".
>
> No. That's not what I meant to say.
>
>
>>
>> (If it's not obvious, conformance is the whole reason we're talking
>> on this list, and why we formed this working group.  ...
>
> No. It's not the WHOLE reason.  It's an important reason but not the
> WHOLE reason.
>
> .......If we're not interested in making an
>> implementation that's interoperable with other implementations,
>> then there's little point in us discussing what an implementation
>> could, would, or should do.)
>
> Well Doug, we all contribute to this process differently don't we.
> Saying that I'm not particularly interested in conformance is not to
> belittle its importance and I made that clear in my note.  It's
> simply that conformance is not my strong point, so let those from the
> group who are stronger in conformance contribute to conformance, and
> let me contribute to areas that are more of interest to me. And if
> everyone contributes according to their strengths and interests,
> we'll have it all covered.
>
> Ray
>

Received on Thursday, 18 June 2015 00:42:36 UTC