Re: CfC: Resolution Annotation Protocol to make JSON-LD default returned if no HTTP Accept request header (deadline 24 June 2015)

+1, Robert.

Regards,
Dave
--
http://about.me/david_wood



> On Jun 10, 2015, at 16:54, Robert Sanderson <azaroth42@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> 
> +1 as this is compatible with the LDP requirements and makes our usage of it easier.
> 
> (I would be, conversely, -1 to anything that made our protocol incompatible with LDP, at least until we have actual experience to prove that the incompatibility is required)
> 
> Rob
> 
> On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 4:47 PM, Frederick Hirsch <w3c@fjhirsch.com <mailto:w3c@fjhirsch.com>> wrote:
> During today's Annotation WG teleconference we discussed and agreed on the following Resolution [1]:
> 
> RESOLUTION: Annotation Protocol spec will override LDP 4.3.2.2 LDP servers SHOULD respond with a text/turtle representation of the requested LDP-RS whenever the Accept request header is absent with "MUST respond with JSON-LD"
> 
> In essence we are profiling the LDP specification [2] in the Web Annotation Protocol specification [3]  to have a 'MUST JSON-LD' instead of a 'SHOULD turtle' in the case no Accept request header is specified [2].
> 
> The reason is to simplify the default requirements for server-side implementation in the case of annotations to enable adoption as well as to be consistent in the preference of JSON-LD.
> 
> We will make the specification language precise as part of adding it to the Web Annotation Protocol specification.
> 
> This is a Call for Consensus (CfC) to ensure wide agreement with this approach. If you have any significant concern with this approach, please indicate on the public annotation list before 24 June (2 weeks). Silence will be considered agreement. (a +1 to indicate support will also be useful if you were not on the call). Please note however that we had consensus on a well-attended call.
> 
> This message is intentionally cross-posted to the public Web Annotation and  LDP WG lists.
> 
> Thanks
> 
> regards, Frederick
> 
> Frederick Hirsch
> Co-Chair, W3C Web Annotation WG
> 
> www.fjhirsch.com <http://www.fjhirsch.com/>
> @fjhirsch
> 
> [1] Draft minutes (may be cleaned up later)
> 
> http://www.w3.org/2015/06/10-annotation-minutes.html#item07 <http://www.w3.org/2015/06/10-annotation-minutes.html#item07>
> 
> [2] http://www.w3.org/TR/ldp/#ldprs <http://www.w3.org/TR/ldp/#ldprs>
> 
> [[
> 4.3.2.2 LDP servers should respond with a text/turtle representation of the requested LDP-RS whenever the Accept request header is absent [turtle].
> ]]
> 
> [3] http://w3c.github.io/web-annotation/protocol/wd/ <http://w3c.github.io/web-annotation/protocol/wd/>
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Rob Sanderson
> Information Standards Advocate
> Digital Library Systems and Services
> Stanford, CA 94305