- From: BigBlueHat via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2015 16:50:55 +0000
- To: public-annotation@w3.org
Thanks for the repost @iherman. How about changing that line to read: > Examples of URIs used to identify fragment specifications: That would have cleared it up for me. It does seem to feel a bit strange to reference the specs--as they're just prose... Perhaps it's hoping for a better world where a machine can ask for the spec and Do The Right Thing after it "reads" it? :smiley: One can hope. :wink: Also, :+1: to going through all the table intros to be sure they're not implying something they shouldn't. -- GitHub Notif of comment by BigBlueHat See https://github.com/w3c/web-annotation/issues/40#issuecomment-117253330
Received on Tuesday, 30 June 2015 16:50:57 UTC