- From: Rob Sanderson via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2015 17:14:21 +0000
- To: public-annotation@w3.org
azaroth42 has just created a new issue for https://github.com/w3c/web-annotation: == Annotation Containers should permit non- ldp:BasicContainer == The protocol specification currently *requires* that Annotation Containers be implementations of ldp:BasicContainer. This prevents implementations from using other types of Container, such as Direct or Indirect Containers or any defined in the future, even if they may be appropriate for business needs. Use Case: In managing a list of annotations, an LDP implementer wants to use a direct container to assert the membership of newly created annotations within the list which is separate from the container itself. This would most easily be done with a DirectContainer, but this is not possible as the Annotation Container must be Basic. Note that BasicContainer and DirectContainer are siblings in the LDP class hierarchy, even though DirectContainer could trivally be a more specific subClassOf BasicContainer. :crying_cat_face: Proposal: Benjamin and Rob to craft spec text that promotes a default of Basic, but allows for others when appropriate. See https://github.com/w3c/web-annotation/issues/37
Received on Thursday, 18 June 2015 17:14:23 UTC