- From: Ivan Herman via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2015 18:47:46 +0000
- To: public-annotation@w3.org
+1 to this proposal Ivan --- Ivan Herman Tel:+31 641044153 http://www.ivan-herman.net (Written on mobile, sorry for brevity and misspellings...) > On 18 Jun 2015, at 19:06, Rob Sanderson <notifications@github.com> wrote: > > The protocol currently refers to the model's default JSON LD context. However it requires additional protocol specific features beyond the annotation model itself, such as ldp:contains, ldp:BasicContainer, iana:alternate and similar. > > We would be mixing concerns by including those protocol specific features into the model's context document. Similarly, if we included all of the model's features into the protocol's context. There is the option for multiple context documents, however this is not known to be a common pattern. > > Proposal: Create a common context document with both the protocol and model's features and reference from both. This might make for administrative challenges (e.g. a revision of the protocol specification will change something referenced by the model) in the future, but better than requiring multiple contexts. > > — > Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub. > -- GitHub Notif of comment by iherman See https://github.com/w3c/web-annotation/issues/36#issuecomment-113255151
Received on Thursday, 18 June 2015 18:47:48 UTC