The latter: remain silent on patch altogether. Ivan --- Ivan Herman Tel:+31 641044153 http://www.ivan-herman.net (Written on mobile, sorry for brevity and misspellings...) > On 13 Jun 2015, at 00:09, Robert Sanderson <azaroth42@gmail.com> wrote: > > > +1 ... I think. Is the resolution to remain silent on the patch format (+1) , or to remain silent on the use of PATCH at all (-0)? > > R > >> On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 1:50 PM, Frederick Hirsch <w3c@fjhirsch.com> wrote: >> fyi, in case you were not on today's Annotation teleconference: >> >> We agreed on today's Annotation teleconference to defer work on Patch until a v.next release >> >> RESOLUTION: Annotation WG defer Patch to later release, not needed for v1 >> >> The rationale is that there are no strong use cases requiring development of this feature now so it should be deferred to v.next. >> >> Thanks >> >> regards, Frederick >> >> Frederick Hirsch >> Co-Chair, W3C Web Annotation WG >> >> www.fjhirsch.com >> @fjhirsch > > > > -- > Rob Sanderson > Information Standards Advocate > Digital Library Systems and Services > Stanford, CA 94305
Received on Saturday, 13 June 2015 02:52:04 UTC