Re: Resolution to defer Patch work

+1 ... I think.  Is the resolution to remain silent on the patch format
(+1) , or to remain silent on the use of PATCH at all (-0)?

R

On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 1:50 PM, Frederick Hirsch <w3c@fjhirsch.com> wrote:

> fyi, in case you were not on today's Annotation teleconference:
>
> We agreed on today's Annotation teleconference to defer work on Patch
> until a v.next release
>
> RESOLUTION: Annotation WG defer Patch to later release, not needed for v1
>
> The rationale is that there are no strong use cases requiring development
> of this feature now so it should be deferred to v.next.
>
> Thanks
>
> regards, Frederick
>
> Frederick Hirsch
> Co-Chair, W3C Web Annotation WG
>
> www.fjhirsch.com
> @fjhirsch
>
>
>


-- 
Rob Sanderson
Information Standards Advocate
Digital Library Systems and Services
Stanford, CA 94305