Reported to Social Web WG

Hey, folks–

I happened to join the Social Web WG telcon a few minutes ago. (I'm 
technically a member of the WG, but I don't track them closely and 
almost never attend their telcons, but I saw that they were meeting and 
on impulse joined the telcon.)

Opportunistically, Harry (their staff contact) asked me to report on the 
Web Annotation WG in the last 5 minutes of the call.

I told them about the different specs we've got in draft form (data 
model, Annotation Protocol, RangeFinder API), and told them we're set 
for a FPWD on Annotation Protocol. I reiterated that we want to make 
sure that there's no conflicts between our deliverables.

They were especially interested in the Annotation Protocol, since 
there's possible intersection/overlap with the SoLiD (Social Linked 
Data) protocol, one of their possible deliverables. They said they'd 
provide feedback on Annotation Protocol.

Nothing much else was said on that topic; it was just a heads-up.

Regarding the rest of their telcon, you can read the minutes, but to me 
as an outsider lending only half an ear, it mostly seemed like 
procedural stuff, regarding goals on publication around the 
ActivityStreams 2 spec. There was also discussion about 
internationalization in AS2, regarding multiple bodies (one for each 
language).

Regards–
–Doug

Received on Tuesday, 23 June 2015 18:30:59 UTC