New draft chaals@yandex-team.ru (Tuesday, 21 October)
- Re: w3process-ACTION-36: Propose new text describing the team that mentions the director, fellows, the ceo, the team, and the fact that responsibilities they have under the process may be delegated chaals@yandex-team.ru (Tuesday, 21 October)
- RE: w3process-ACTION-36: Propose new text describing the team that mentions the director, fellows, the ceo, the team, and the fact that responsibilities they have under the process may be delegated Michael Champion (MS OPEN TECH) (Tuesday, 21 October)
- Re: w3process-ACTION-36: Propose new text describing the team that mentions the director, fellows, the ceo, the team, and the fact that responsibilities they have under the process may be delegated Jeff Jaffe (Tuesday, 21 October)
- Re: w3process-ACTION-36: Propose new text describing the team that mentions the director, fellows, the ceo, the team, and the fact that responsibilities they have under the process may be delegated chaals@yandex-team.ru (Wednesday, 22 October)
- Re: w3process-ACTION-36: Propose new text describing the team that mentions the director, fellows, the ceo, the team, and the fact that responsibilities they have under the process may be delegated Jeff Jaffe (Wednesday, 22 October)
- Re: w3process-ACTION-36: Propose new text describing the team that mentions the director, fellows, the ceo, the team, and the fact that responsibilities they have under the process may be delegated David Singer (Thursday, 23 October)
- Re: w3process-ACTION-36: Propose new text describing the team that mentions the director, fellows, the ceo, the team, and the fact that responsibilities they have under the process may be delegated Jeff Jaffe (Thursday, 23 October)
- Re: w3process-ACTION-36: Propose new text describing the team that mentions the director, fellows, the ceo, the team, and the fact that responsibilities they have under the process may be delegated chaals@yandex-team.ru (Thursday, 23 October)
- Re: w3process-ACTION-36: Propose new text describing the team that mentions the director, fellows, the ceo, the team, and the fact that responsibilities they have under the process may be delegated Jeff Jaffe (Thursday, 23 October)
- Re: w3process-ACTION-36: Propose new text describing the team that mentions the director, fellows, the ceo, the team, and the fact that responsibilities they have under the process may be delegated David Singer (Friday, 24 October)
- Re: w3process-ACTION-36: Propose new text describing the team that mentions the director, fellows, the ceo, the team, and the fact that responsibilities they have under the process may be delegated chaals@yandex-team.ru (Thursday, 23 October)
Re: w3process-ACTION-36: Propose new text describing the team that mentions the director, fellows, the ceo, the team, and the fact that responsibilities they have under the process may be delegated chaals@yandex-team.ru (Tuesday, 21 October)
- Re: w3process-ISSUE-124 (WHATWG-blacklist): Normative Reference policy should explicitly black list WHATWG specs [Normative Reference Policy] Arthur Barstow (Thursday, 2 October)
- Re: w3process-ISSUE-124 (WHATWG-blacklist): Normative Reference policy should explicitly black list WHATWG specs [Normative Reference Policy] Jeff Jaffe (Thursday, 2 October)
- Re: w3process-ISSUE-124 (WHATWG-blacklist): Normative Reference policy should explicitly black list WHATWG specs [Normative Reference Policy] Tim Berners-Lee (Friday, 3 October)
- Re: w3process-ISSUE-124 (WHATWG-blacklist): Normative Reference policy should explicitly black list WHATWG specs [Normative Reference Policy] Steve Faulkner (Saturday, 4 October)
- Re: w3process-ISSUE-124 (WHATWG-blacklist): Normative Reference policy should explicitly black list WHATWG specs [Normative Reference Policy] Daniel Glazman (Saturday, 4 October)
- Re: w3process-ISSUE-124 (WHATWG-blacklist): Normative Reference policy should explicitly black list WHATWG specs [Normative Reference Policy] David (Standards) Singer (Monday, 6 October)
- Re: w3process-ISSUE-124 (WHATWG-blacklist): Normative Reference policy should explicitly black list WHATWG specs [Normative Reference Policy] David (Standards) Singer (Tuesday, 7 October)
- Re: w3process-ISSUE-124 (WHATWG-blacklist): Normative Reference policy should explicitly black list WHATWG specs [Normative Reference Policy] Ian Hickson (Tuesday, 7 October)
- Re: w3process-ISSUE-124 (WHATWG-blacklist): Normative Reference policy should explicitly black list WHATWG specs [Normative Reference Policy] David (Standards) Singer (Tuesday, 7 October)
- Re: w3process-ISSUE-124 (WHATWG-blacklist): Normative Reference policy should explicitly black list WHATWG specs [Normative Reference Policy] Ian Hickson (Tuesday, 7 October)
- Re: w3process-ISSUE-124 (WHATWG-blacklist): Normative Reference policy should explicitly black list WHATWG specs [Normative Reference Policy] David (Standards) Singer (Tuesday, 7 October)
Keeping the tone nice Re: w3process-ISSUE-124 chaals@yandex-team.ru (Friday, 3 October)
Re: w3process-ISSUE-124 (WHATWG-blacklist): Normative Reference policy should explicitly black list WHATWG specs [Normative Reference Policy] JC Verdié (Friday, 3 October)
Re: w3process-ISSUE-124 (WHATWG-blacklist): Normative Reference policy should explicitly black list WHATWG specs [Normative Reference Policy] Sam Ruby (Friday, 3 October)
Re: w3process-ISSUE-124 (WHATWG-blacklist): Normative Reference policy should explicitly black list WHATWG specs [Normative Reference Policy] David (Standards) Singer (Friday, 3 October)
Re: 2014 Process: WD -> CR difficulties David (Standards) Singer (Friday, 3 October)
[DocumentReview] [Was: Re: 2014 Process: WD -> CR difficulties] Arthur Barstow (Thursday, 2 October)
Re: 2014 Process: WD -> CR difficulties Jeff Jaffe (Wednesday, 1 October)
Re: 2014 Process: WD -> CR difficulties timeless@gmail.com (Tuesday, 7 October)
Last message date: Friday, 31 October 2014 20:38:34 UTC