W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-w3process@w3.org > October 2014

Re: w3process-ACTION-36: Propose new text describing the team that mentions the director, fellows, the ceo, the team, and the fact that responsibilities they have under the process may be delegated

From: Jeff Jaffe <jeff@w3.org>
Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2014 09:32:29 -0400
Message-ID: <5449036D.40203@w3.org>
To: David Singer <singer@apple.com>
CC: chaals@yandex-team.ru, Revising W3C Process Community Group <public-w3process@w3.org>

On 10/23/2014 3:29 AM, David Singer wrote:
> On Oct 22, 2014, at 18:05 , Jeff Jaffe <jeff@w3.org> wrote:
>
>>>> 2. In today's discussion about the reference to Hosts, Steve said we
>>>> might not need it here because it is "somewhere".  Except that I think
>>>> that somewhere is actually here!  I think there is a consensus that it
>>>> should be somewhere.
>>> I don't believe there is a consensus. You were in favour of mentioning them (I don't really understand why) and I am not (since they play no role in the Process itself, and were *only* mentioned in this section).
>> I agree there is no consensus between you and I on this point.
> well, do you agree that if they play a role in the process, they should be mentioned, and if not, not?
>
> If so, we just need to establish the role they play in the process, if any

I described my rationale on last Tuesday's call.

Basically, since this is the "W3C Process Document", I feel it is 
sensible to define somewhere in the process document who W3C is.  It 
does not need to be in this section, but it should be somewhere.

So the Host's role in the process is at the "meta" level, they comprise 
the definition of what the phrase W3C means.  Without a definition of 
the Hosts there is no anchoring for the entire document.

>
> David Singer
> Manager, Software Standards, Apple Inc.
>
Received on Thursday, 23 October 2014 13:32:40 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:35:12 UTC