W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-w3process@w3.org > October 2014

Re: CfC: create a public list to announce new publications; deadline Oct 15

From: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2014 13:58:35 -0400
Message-ID: <543D644B.30002@inkedblade.net>
To: Daniel Glazman <daniel.glazman@disruptive-innovations.com>, public-w3process@w3.org
On 10/08/2014 04:37 PM, Daniel Glazman wrote:
> On 08/10/2014 13:09, Arthur Barstow wrote:
>> In the spirit of facilitating and increasing the likelihood of early and
>> wide document reviews, a number of people in thread [1] voiced support
>> for creating a Public list the Publications team would use to announce
>> publications of FPWDs, LCWDs, 2014-preCRs and CRs. This is a Call for
>> Consensus (CfC) to create such a list and for the Publications team to
>> use it when these types of documents are published.
>    1. the Reply-To field of announcements there is set to the
>       corresponding W3C mailing-list, as much as possible.
>       Example: Team announces a new CSS draft, the reply-to is then set
>       to www-style@w3.org

Yes, definitely.

>    2. announcements there are Team's duty. The CSS WG editors for
>       instance already announce new documents in www-style, twitter and
>       blog and that's enough.

I disagree, actually. The Team already announces such documents on the
W3C news. Such announcements are very generic and don't provide the
necessary context for understanding how to address the review request.
This is the reason the editors, not the staff contact, in the CSSWG
are responsible for the announcements to www-style and the blog.

If there's no reason the announcement to www-style and public-review-announce
should not be exactly the same, then they should just be copies of the
same message, sent by the same person. Why not?

If these announcements should be different somehow, I'd like to know how.

Received on Tuesday, 14 October 2014 17:59:10 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:35:12 UTC