W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-w3process@w3.org > October 2014

RE: CfC: create a public list to announce new publications; deadline Oct 15

From: Stephen Zilles <szilles@adobe.com>
Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2014 20:38:02 +0000
To: Wayne Carr <wayne.carr@linux.intel.com>, Jeff Jaffe <jeff@w3.org>, "Arthur Barstow" <art.barstow@gmail.com>
CC: public-w3process <public-w3process@w3.org>
Message-ID: <8f0b704391cb459a837f771bfb911402@BN1PR02MB183.namprd02.prod.outlook.com>
+1 to Wayne's message below

Steve Z

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Wayne Carr [mailto:wayne.carr@linux.intel.com]
> Sent: Friday, October 31, 2014 12:58 PM
> To: Jeff Jaffe; Arthur Barstow
> Cc: public-w3process; Stephen Zilles
> Subject: Re: CfC: create a public list to announce new publications; deadline Oct
> 15
> 
> 
> On 2014-10-18 19:22, Jeff Jaffe wrote:
> >
> > On 10/16/2014 10:03 AM, Arthur Barstow wrote:
> >> On 10/8/14 10:41 AM, Jeff Jaffe wrote:
> >>>
> >>> On 10/8/2014 7:09 AM, Arthur Barstow wrote:
> >>>> In the spirit of facilitating and increasing the likelihood of
> >>>> early and wide document reviews, a number of people in thread [1]
> >>>> voiced support for creating a Public list the Publications team
> >>>> would use to announce publications of FPWDs, LCWDs, 2014-preCRs and
> >>>> CRs. This is a Call for Consensus (CfC) to create such a list and
> >>>> for the Publications team to use it when these types of documents
> >>>> are published.
> >>>>
> >>>> If anyone has any comments or concerns about this CfC, please reply
> >>>> by Oct 15.
> >>>
> >>> I support this proposal.  We may need more [2], but this would be a
> >>> good start.
> >>
> >> I didn't see any objections to this CfC and I added the requests from
> >> David, Tim and others for what I'd characterize as "dashboard like"
> >> solutions to the [Dashboard] wiki.
> >>
> >> WRT moving forward with this proposal, do you want me to ask SysReq
> >> to create public-review-announce or should I create an action for you
> >> or someone else? After the list is created, I'll update
> >> [DocumentReview] accordingly.
> >
> > I see that Steve (chair of the W3C Process task force) has raised some
> > discussion points.  I suppose that I would like to get those resolved
> > (either on the list or in the weekly process CG teleconferences)
> > before we move to implementation.
> 
> I talked to Steve at TPAC.  His issues are resolved.  It was a matter of editing the
> wiki and Steve did that.  I think we should implement this.
> 
> >
> >>
> >> After that, someone should notify the chairs list about the new
> >> list's availability and expected usage. (I can do this if you want
> >> but am happy to defer to staff.)
> >>
> >> -AB
> >>
> >> [Dashboard]
> >> https://www.w3.org/wiki/Dashboard#Document_Review_Dashboard
> >> [DocumentReview] https://www.w3.org/wiki/DocumentReview
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> >
Received on Friday, 31 October 2014 20:38:34 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:35:12 UTC