- From: Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2014 18:44:44 -0400
- To: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>, W3C Process Community Group <public-w3process@w3.org>
On 10/14/14 10:32 PM, fantasai wrote: > A. Write in the errata as diff marks (using <ins> and <del>) in the > spec. Maintain a separate list similar to a DoC explaining > the changes, and possibly also tracking the status of their tests > and impls. I like this proposal (possibly using a special stylesheet to accentuate the changes)! Errata are a PIA and I can't think of any important stakeholder that `wins` by using a separate document. Why can't we run a live experiment and try this and if/when the changes get too cumbersome, then we have a few options to pursue. (I'd be more than happy to be the guinea pig with the Touch Events REC that needs some errata.) -AB
Received on Wednesday, 15 October 2014 22:45:12 UTC