W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-w3process@w3.org > October 2014

Re: ISSUE-55 - can we address it after TPAC?

From: David (Standards) Singer <singer@apple.com>
Date: Mon, 06 Oct 2014 09:06:05 -0700
Cc: Revising W3C Process Community Group <public-w3process@w3.org>
Message-id: <9B6AD707-D672-4618-9BDA-BF663FF56168@apple.com>
To: chaals@yandex-team.ru
<http://www.w3.org/community/w3process/track/issues/55>

AC Meetings should not be scheduled to overlap All WG meetings


Sure, after TPAC is fine.

FWIW, I would like the organizational meetings (AC, AB, probably TAG) scheduled before or after TPAC.  Itís only once a year, and TPAC is much too good an opportunity for technical cross-fertilization and discussion.


On Oct 6, 2014, at 7:46 , chaals@yandex-team.ru wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> I am writing and asking the AC to weigh in on this open issue, since it directly effects them and I think it would be silly for us to try closing it without asking them.
> 
> Hopefully we will get some input on this list as a result, and I expect to get some input at TPAC (where some people complain about the current setup, and others about proposed alternatives), and most importantly feedback on this year's experiment of changing the timing in an attempt to square the circles of scheduling everything to minimise travel time, maximise meeting time, and take best advantage of the fact that so many people are available to allow a lot of cross-group communication.
> 
> So I'd like us to postpone this issue until after TPAC, when the feedback is in.
> 
> cheers
> 
> --
> Charles McCathie Nevile - web standards - CTO Office, Yandex
> chaals@yandex-team.ru - - - Find more at http://yandex.com
> 

David Singer
Manager, Software Standards, Apple Inc.
Received on Monday, 6 October 2014 16:06:40 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:35:12 UTC