- From: Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>
- Date: Fri, 03 Oct 2014 08:57:08 -0400
- To: public-w3process@w3.org
On 10/02/2014 05:29 PM, Arthur Barstow wrote: > Again, it is unfortunate > the meeting wasn't held in a transparent way and that "minutes" from the > meeting aren't sufficient to back either position. I disagree. You made a specific claim about a specific individual taking a specific position. It boggles my mind that you now claim that very minutes you asked to be published don't record anything resembling that claim as evidence that the minutes "aren't sufficient to back either position". I was in the meeting. I've seen the minutes. Issue 124 should be summarily closed as invalid. Meanwhile, I'm personally choosing to invest some time on getting the URL specification to be improved, hopefully to the point where it could eventually be seriously considered: http://intertwingly.net/blog/2014/09/16/The-URL-Mess#c1412337508 - Sam Ruby
Received on Friday, 3 October 2014 12:57:35 UTC