Thursday, 1 February 2001
- Outputs of this working group?
- RE: DS810 - Revised
- RE: [R3xx] Requirements Section "4.2 Simplicity and Stability" -- com parison with SOAP1.1.
- RE: [R6xx, R7xx] Application of XP requirements to SOAP 1.1
- RE: [R6xx, R7xx] Application of XP requirements to SOAP 1.1
Wednesday, 31 January 2001
- Deconstructing DS7
- RE: [SOAP] soap question
- Jan 24, 2001 teleconference minutes
- DS810 - Revised
- RE: [SOAP] soap question
- RE: [R6xx, R7xx] Application of XP requirements to SOAP 1.1
- RE: [R6xx, R7xx] Application of XP requirements to SOAP 1.1
- Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-carpenter-midtax-00.txt
- RE: [R3xx] Requirements Section "4.2 Simplicity and Stability" -- com parison with SOAP1.1.
- RE: XP->SOAP/1.1 requirement mappings for R8xx (Intermediaries)
- RE: [R6xx, R7xx] Application of XP requirements to SOAP 1.1
- RE: [R2xx] Application of XP Requirements to SOAP 1.1
- RE: [R3xx] Requirements Section "4.2 Simplicity and Stability" -- com parison with SOAP1.1.
- RE: [R5xx] Application of requirements to SOAP 1.1
- [R3xx] Requirements Section "4.2 Simplicity and Stability" -- com parison with SOAP1.1.
- [R5xx] Application of requirements to SOAP 1.1
- XP->SOAP/1.1 requirement mappings for R8xx (Intermediaries)
- [R2xx] Application of XP Requirements to SOAP 1.1
Tuesday, 30 January 2001
- XP serialization, XTM topicmap serialization, RDF.
- Re: Binary (and XHTML, and *ML ...) attachments to XP
- Re: Binary attachments to XP: or unipart vs. multipart
Wednesday, 24 January 2001
Tuesday, 30 January 2001
Monday, 29 January 2001
- DS23/24 - application semantics?
- Re: [DS4] Remote Procedure Call (RPC) - revised
- Re: [DS5] Request with acknowledgement - revised
- new use case DS24: caching
- new use case DS21: incremental parsing/processing of XP messages
- new use case DS20: multiple, asynchronous responses
- [DS7] Third part intermediary - revised
- new use case DS19: sending non-XML data
- new use case DS23: event/notification
- text for overlooked use cases
- RE: [R6xx, R7xx] Application of XP requirements to SOAP 1.1
- FW: Protocol Action: (BEEP/Blocks/BXXP) to proposed standard
Sunday, 28 January 2001
Friday, 26 January 2001
- RE: [R6xx, R7xx] Application of XP requirements to SOAP 1.1
- DS for R306 Easy Deployment
- RE: Soap from javascript
- Soap from javascript
- RE: [SOAP] soap question
- RE: Role of intermediary
- RE: Role of intermediary
- RE: Role of intermediary
- Re: FW: [SOAP] SOAP method parameter as XML string - Question ?
- FW: [SOAP] soap question
- FW: [SOAP] SOAP method parameter as XML string - Question ?
- RE: [AMG] Comments on strawman: Service Abstraction
- RE: [AMG] Comments on strawman: Terminology and Diagrams
Thursday, 25 January 2001
- RE: Binary attachments to XP
- Re: Binary (and XHTML, and *ML ...) attachments to XP
- Re: Binary (and XHTML, and *ML ...) attachments to XP
- [AMG] Comments on strawman
- RE: [R6xx, R7xx] Application of XP requirements to SOAP 1.1
- Jan 17, 2001 teleconference minutes
- RE: Role of intermediary
- Re: Role of intermediary
- Re: [DS5] Request with acknowledgement - revised
- Re: [DS5] Request with acknowledgement - revised
- RE: Binary attachments to XP
- RE: Role of intermediary
- Re: Role of intermediary
- [R6xx, R7xx] Application of XP requirements to SOAP 1.1
- RE: Binary attachments to XP
- RE: Role of intermediary
- RE: DS3 and unipart vs. multipart
- RE: Binary attachments to XP
Wednesday, 24 January 2001
- RE: [DS5] Request with acknowledgement - revised
- DS3 and unipart vs. multipart
- Re: xp requirement document specifies headers
- RE: Binary attachments to XP: or unipart vs. multipart
- RE: [DS5] Request with acknowledgement - revised
- RE: xp requirement document specifies headers
- Re: Binary attachments to XP: or unipart vs. multipart
- RE: Re: [DS4] Remote Procedure Call (RPC) - revised
- Re: [DS4] Remote Procedure Call (RPC) - revised
- Re: xp requirement document specifies headers
- RE: Binary attachments to XP
- Binary attachments to XP: or unipart vs. multipart
- RE: xp requirement document specifies headers
- RE: Role of intermediary
- Re: Implementation of XML QUERY
- RE: Binary attachments to XP
- Re: xp requirement document specifies headers
- Re: xp requirement document specifies headers
- overlooked use cases - latest
- Re: Role of intermediary
Tuesday, 23 January 2001
- Re: xp requirement document specifies headers
- Re: xp requirement document specifies headers
- Re: xp requirement document specifies headers
- Re: Implementation of XML QUERY
- Re: List of all pubilcations
- List of all pubilcations
- [AMG]: Notes on Ad-hoc f2f Meeting 17th January
- Implementation of XML QUERY
Monday, 22 January 2001
- Re: Questions from a new-comer
- Fw: Binary (and XHTML, and *ML ...) attachments to XP
- RE: xp requirement document specifies headers
- RE: xp requirement document specifies headers
- Re: xp requirement document specifies headers
- xp requirement document specifies headers
- Re: overlooked use cases
- overlooked use cases
- RE: Binary attachments to XP
- RE: Strawman Abstract Model for XP
Saturday, 20 January 2001
- Re: Role of intermediary
- Questions from a new-comer
- WebDAV Delta-V Working Group Last Call (fwd)
- Re: Role of intermediary
Friday, 19 January 2001
- Re: [DS3] Request-response - revised
- DS810 (DR810) QoS
- DS809
- DS807
- DS805
- Re: Role of intermediary
- Re: Role of intermediary
- Role of intermediary
- Re: [DS8] Conversational message exchange - revised
- Re: [DS8] Conversational message exchange - revised
- Re: [DS8] Conversational message exchange - revised
- RE: Strawman Abstract Model for XP
- Abstract Model sub-group of the XML Protocol Working Group.
- Re: [DS8] Conversational message exchange - revised
- [DS8] Conversational message exchange - revised
Thursday, 18 January 2001
- Re: [DS4] Remote Procedure Call (RPC) - revised
- RE: [DS8] Conversational message exchange - revised
- Re: [DS8] Conversational message exchange - revised
- Re: [DS8] Conversational message exchange - revised
- RE: [DS3] Request-response - revised
- [DS8] Conversational message exchange - revised
- [DS6] Request with encrypted payload - revised
- [DS5] Request with acknowledgement - revised
- [DS4] Remote Procedure Call (RPC) - revised
- [DS3] Request-response - revised
Wednesday, 17 January 2001
- Re: XML Protocols dependencies on Sig and Encryption
- DS6: Proposed revision
- DS5: Proposed revision
- Jan 10, 2001 teleconference minutes
- Re: XML Protocols dependencies on Sig and Encryption
- XML Palsers for different browers
Tuesday, 16 January 2001
Monday, 15 January 2001
Saturday, 13 January 2001
Friday, 12 January 2001
Thursday, 11 January 2001
- RE: Integrating XP Into Web Infrastructure
- Jan 3, 2001 teleconference minutes
- RE: Comment on Evolution of XML protocol requirements
- RE: Comment on Evolution of XML protocol requirements
- Re: question about XML protocol requirements
- RE: question about XML protocol requirements
- RE: question about XML protocol requirements
Wednesday, 10 January 2001
- Re: DR305 -- proposed disposition
- Re: [R700b] Optional/mandatory bit (was: Comments on XML Protocol Reqs)
- RE: [R700b] Optional/mandatory bit (was: Comments on XML Protocol Reqs)
- RE: [R700b] Optional/mandatory bit (was: Comments on XML Protocol Reqs)
- [R700b] Optional/mandatory bit (was: Comments on XML Protocol Reqs)
- Comment on Evolution of XML protocol requirements
- XML-RPC for C and C++
- Re: question about XML protocol requirements
- Re: question about XML protocol requirements
- RE: question about XML protocol requirements
- Dec 20, 2000 teleconference minutes
Tuesday, 9 January 2001
- question about XML protocol requirements
- Another use case supporting binary data exchanges - FW: [DOTNET] Posting Binary file with XML...
- RE: Integrating XP Into Web Infrastructure
- RE: Integrating XP Into Web Infrastructure
- Re: Integrating XP Into Web Infrastructure
- The difference between RPCs and data query
- Re: Integrating XP Into Web Infrastructure
- Re: Integrating XP Into Web Infrastructure
- RE: Integrating XP Into Web Infrastructure
- Re: Integrating XP Into Web Infrastructure
- Re: Integrating XP Into Web Infrastructure
- Re: Integrating XP Into Web Infrastructure
- Re: Integrating XP Into Web Infrastructure
- Re: Integrating XP Into Web Infrastructure
- Re: Integrating XP Into Web Infrastructure
- Re: Integrating XP Into Web Infrastructure
- Re: Integrating XP Into Web Infrastructure
- Integrating XP Into Web Infrastructure
Monday, 8 January 2001
Saturday, 6 January 2001
Friday, 5 January 2001
Thursday, 4 January 2001
- Re: MIME marking for SOAP and XP (was text/xml for SOAP (and XP) con sidered harmful)
- DR309 -- resolution
- RE: DR309 -- resolution
- RE: DR309 -- resolution
- FYI - FW: Namespace doc. from OASIS
- DR309 -- resolution
- Re: MIME marking for SOAP and XP (was text/xml for SOAP (and XP) con sidered harmful)
- XML Protocol Requirements Document Published
- Re: MIME marking for SOAP and XP (was text/xml for SOAP (and XP) con sidered harmful)
Wednesday, 3 January 2001
- RE: text/xml for SOAP (and XP) considered harmful
- RE: text/xml for SOAP (and XP) considered harmful
- RE: text/xml for SOAP (and XP) considered harmful
- Re: MIME marking for SOAP and XP (was text/xml for SOAP (and XP) con sidered harmful)
- RE: DR305 -- ongoing discussion
- RE: DR305 -- ongoing discussion