Re: MIME marking for SOAP and XP (was text/xml for SOAP (and XP) con sidered harmful) from Mark Baker on 2001-01-04 (xml-dist-app@w3.org from January 2001)

From: Mark Baker <mark.baker@canada.sun.com>
Date: Thu, 04 Jan 2001 14:53:32 -0500
To: Mark Nottingham <mnot@akamai.com>
CC: Andrew Layman <andrewl@microsoft.com>, xml-dist-app@w3.org, mmurata@trl.ibm.co.jp
Message-ID: <3A54D4BC.E2664C32@canada.sun.com>

Good catch Mark.  Yes, that appears to cover my concern (modulo my
distaste for the use of the term "transport" in this context - but we've
had that discussion before 8-).

Thanks.

Mark Nottingham wrote:
> R803 implies the ability to interpose a non-processing intermediary
> with no ill effect (i.e., the message will be opaque to the
> intermediary):
> 
>   XML Protocol must not preclude the use of transport bindings that
>   define transport intermediary roles such as store-and-forward,
>   proxy and gateway.

Received on Thursday, 4 January 2001 14:49:35 UTC