- From: Anderson, William L <WAnderson@crt.xerox.com>
- Date: Thu, 4 Jan 2001 11:14:47 -0500
- To: "'David Ezell'" <David_E3@Verifone.Com>, "'xml-dist-app@w3.org'" <xml-dist-app@w3.org>
David, well that's pretty crisp. But I have 1 small change: === Proposed revision: R309 XML Protocol should support applications that operate on resource constrained devices. === Rationale: future tense is weak and doesn't add any value. Bill A > -----Original Message----- > From: David Ezell [mailto:David_E3@Verifone.Com] > Sent: Thursday, January 04, 2001 10:47 AM > To: 'xml-dist-app@w3.org' > Subject: DR309 -- resolution > > > The XML Protocol WG decided on 2000-01-03 to simplify > requirement 309 [1] and > include it in the requirements document working draft [2] > (comments period > through Jan 12) [3]. > > === Proposed revision: > > >R309 > > > >XML Protocol should support applications which will operate > on resource > >constrained devices. > > === Rationale: > > Reference to XHTML proved to be too controversial or > misunderstood (if > a few people went and skimmed the spec as a result of the > discussion, I > guess it was worth the trouble.) Other references, such as to XML > Infoset, were deemed possibly too constraining. > > Best Regards, > David Ezell > > [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/xml-dist-app/2000Dec/0266.html > [2] http://www.w3.org/TR/2000/WD-xp-reqs-20001219/ > [3] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/xml-dist-app/2000Dec/0210.html >
Received on Thursday, 4 January 2001 11:16:41 UTC