- From: <john_ibbotson@uk.ibm.com>
- Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2001 20:12:20 +0000
- To: xml-dist-app@w3.org
This scenario assumes data is to be delivered from the sender to the
receiver. Therefore there are two
possible outcomes. Either the data was delivered or there was some failure.
I think the scenario should
be more prescriptive than the suggested changes. How about :
DS5 A sender wishes to reliably exchange data with a receiver.
It wishes to be notified of the status of the data delivery
to the receiver. The status may take the form of:
1) The data has been successfully delivered to the receiver,
or
2) Some failure has occurred which prevents the sucessful
delivery to the receiver.
instead of:
DS5 A sender wishes to exchange data with a receiver. Data is sent
from the sender to the receiver, and a positive acknowledgement
is returned to the sender indicating a successful transfer.
Note: DS5 differentiates from DS3 and DS4 in that an acknowledgement is
semantically different from any business-level response which
the receiver might send. The acknowledgement only indicates a
successful transfer of the message from one node to another.
XML Technology and Messaging,
IBM UK Ltd, Hursley Park,
Winchester, SO21 2JN
Tel: (work) +44 (0)1962 815188 (home) +44 (0)1722 781271
Fax: +44 (0)1962 816898
Notes Id: John Ibbotson/UK/IBM
email: john_ibbotson@uk.ibm.com
Received on Monday, 29 January 2001 15:18:33 UTC