- From: <john_ibbotson@uk.ibm.com>
- Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2001 20:12:20 +0000
- To: xml-dist-app@w3.org
This scenario assumes data is to be delivered from the sender to the receiver. Therefore there are two possible outcomes. Either the data was delivered or there was some failure. I think the scenario should be more prescriptive than the suggested changes. How about : DS5 A sender wishes to reliably exchange data with a receiver. It wishes to be notified of the status of the data delivery to the receiver. The status may take the form of: 1) The data has been successfully delivered to the receiver, or 2) Some failure has occurred which prevents the sucessful delivery to the receiver. instead of: DS5 A sender wishes to exchange data with a receiver. Data is sent from the sender to the receiver, and a positive acknowledgement is returned to the sender indicating a successful transfer. Note: DS5 differentiates from DS3 and DS4 in that an acknowledgement is semantically different from any business-level response which the receiver might send. The acknowledgement only indicates a successful transfer of the message from one node to another. XML Technology and Messaging, IBM UK Ltd, Hursley Park, Winchester, SO21 2JN Tel: (work) +44 (0)1962 815188 (home) +44 (0)1722 781271 Fax: +44 (0)1962 816898 Notes Id: John Ibbotson/UK/IBM email: john_ibbotson@uk.ibm.com
Received on Monday, 29 January 2001 15:18:33 UTC