RE: [R3xx] Requirements Section "4.2 Simplicity and Stability" -- com parison with SOAP1.1. from Henrik Frystyk Nielsen on 2001-02-01 (xml-dist-app@w3.org from January 2001)

From: Henrik Frystyk Nielsen <frystyk@microsoft.com>
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2001 16:34:12 -0800
To: "Williams, Stuart" <skw@hplb.hpl.hp.com>, "EZELL, DAVID $HP-Verifone,unix1$" <david_e3@verifone.com>
Cc: <xml-dist-app@w3.org>
Message-ID: <002a01c08be6$b2ed02b0$308f3b9d@redmond.corp.microsoft.com>

> "Also note that "application" semantics are
> clearly out of scope (as they are for SOAP1.1),
> whereas "operational" semantics of a messaging
> system are in scope."
>
>Certainly, from my point-of-view the abstract model is really
>only trying to
>construct a framework that will ultimately help us go forward into the
>design process and hopefully will help us to articulate our design.

Sounds good to me. Btw, I would think message exchange patterns fit as part of
"application space" - it is hard to talk about clients and servers and message
flows without having a particular application in mind.

Henrik

Received on Wednesday, 31 January 2001 19:34:50 UTC