Re: [R700b] Optional/mandatory bit (was: Comments on XML Protocol Reqs)

Henrik Frystyk Nielsen wrote:
> I don't think we would want this to be grokked by XP. On the other hand,
> it would seem possible to build this on top of XP as the single
> optional/mandatory means that we always have a well-defined processing
> model at the core.

FWIW, I agree with Henrik.  Let's use the extensibility we're building
into XP for our own benefit too.

MB

Received on Wednesday, 10 January 2001 15:14:37 UTC