W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > xml-dist-app@w3.org > January 2001

Re: Role of intermediary

From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@akamai.com>
Date: Fri, 19 Jan 2001 13:56:48 -0800
To: Marwan Sabbouh <ms@mitre.org>
Cc: xml-dist-app@w3.org
Message-ID: <20010119135647.G1123@akamai.com>

I hope not ;) 

It would take some magic in the routing - you'd have to have
something that says "the next hop goes THERE", where THERE is using a
different protocol binding.

I'm trying to write a little paper about intermediaries in XP, will
hopefully clarify.


On Fri, Jan 19, 2001 at 04:39:34PM -0500, Marwan Sabbouh wrote:
> I have this question to the group: Is there anything in the spec that might prevent an intermediary for receiving incoming messages using one protocol binding and forwarding them using another? 
> Thanks.
> Marwan

Mark Nottingham, Research Scientist
Akamai Technologies (San Mateo, CA)
Received on Friday, 19 January 2001 16:57:26 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 23:11:30 UTC