- From: Oisin Hurley <ohurley@iona.com>
- Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2001 22:46:36 -0000
- To: "Orchard, David" <dorchard@jamcracker.com>, <dick@8760.com>, "XP-PUBLIC" <xml-dist-app@w3.org>
<dick b> Another use case from the SOAP list indicating that XP may need to support "Objects" as payloads. I don't believe XP has a use case for passing objects, should this be considered a valid use case for XP? </dick b> <dave o> Yes, consider it a use-case. </dave o> Hmm, if you want to consider this a use-case, then you will have to address the fact that there is no object model in XP. Given this non-trivial issue, I would suggest that this not be included as a use case. It is more appropriate to say that sending 'objects' (whatever they are :) in XP messages is an implementation language specific XML serialization issue. cheers --oh
Received on Wednesday, 31 January 2001 17:46:12 UTC