- From: David Ezell <David_E3@Verifone.Com>
- Date: Tue, 2 Jan 2001 17:02:23 -0500
- To: "'Anderson, William L'" <WAnderson@crt.xerox.com>
- Cc: "'xml-dist-app@w3.org'" <xml-dist-app@w3.org>
On Tue 1/2/2001 4:55 PM -5:00 Bill Anderson wrote: >"Following the example of XHTML Basic [1], XML Protocol supports >_applications_ that work on resource constrained devices, including devices >that do not support the feature set normally associated with XML processing >environments." Actually, I think we need to stay with either "should work" or "must work" for a consistent "requirement look and feel". "Should" gives us more wiggle room. Thoughts? Regards, David
Received on Tuesday, 2 January 2001 17:02:31 UTC