www-ws-desc@w3.org from November 2003 by author

Allen Brookes

• RE: Schemas in imported WSDL (Thursday, 13 November)
• Schemas in imported WSDL (Thursday, 13 November)

Amelia A. Lewis

• Re: Schemas in imported WSDL (Friday, 14 November)
• Re: on WSDL 2.0 Part 1: Core Language, 031110 (Friday, 14 November)
• Fw: RE: Circular includes (Thursday, 13 November)
• Re: Schemas in imported WSDL (Thursday, 13 November)
• Re: A schema for each mep? (Monday, 10 November)
• Re: are fault-replaces-message (FRM) and message-triggers-fault ( MTF) equivalent (Monday, 10 November)
• Re: are fault-replaces-message (FRM) and message-triggers-fault ( MTF) equivalent (Friday, 7 November)
• Re: are fault-replaces-message (FRM) and message-triggers-fault (MTF) equivalent (Monday, 3 November)
• Re: editorial question: change NS prefixes in bindings doc? (Monday, 3 November)
• Re: are fault-replaces-message (FRM) and message-triggers-fault (MTF) equivalent (Monday, 3 November)
• Re: ALTERNATIVE PROPOSAL: Short-cut syntax for in-out and in-only patterns (Monday, 3 November)

Anne Thomas Manes

• Re: What WSDL defines - the diagram! (Tuesday, 4 November)
• RE: are fault-replaces-message (FRM) and message-triggers-fault (MTF) equivalent (Monday, 3 November)

Arthur Ryman

• Re: Counterproposal for service references (Wednesday, 5 November)
• The Department Directory Use Case Using <wsdl:reference> (Wednesday, 5 November)
• Re: Counterproposal for service references (Wednesday, 5 November)
• The Department Directory: A Use Case for Abstract Interfaces in Service References (Tuesday, 4 November)

Bijan Parsia

• Today's log (Thursday, 20 November)

Champion, Mike

• RE: HTTP binding options (Monday, 10 November)

David Booth

• Re: proposal for simplifying interface extensions (Thursday, 13 November)
• RE: What WSDL defines - the diagram! (Wednesday, 12 November)
• RE: What WSDL defines - the diagram! (Monday, 10 November)
• RE: What WSDL defines - the diagram! (Monday, 10 November)
• RE: What WSDL defines - the diagram! (Friday, 7 November)
• Re: What WSDL defines - the diagram! (Thursday, 6 November)
• Re: What WSDL defines - the diagram! (Wednesday, 5 November)

David Orchard

• RE: Revisiting WSDL Compontent Designators (Thursday, 13 November)
• RE: HTTP binding options (Thursday, 13 November)
• Suggest TAG/WSD WG liaison meeting at tech plenary (Wednesday, 12 November)
• Marking WSDL operations as "safe", in scope requirement? (Wednesday, 12 November)
• RE: Revisiting WSDL Compontent Designators (Wednesday, 12 November)
• RE: HTTP binding options (Wednesday, 12 November)
• RE: HTTP binding options (Wednesday, 12 November)
• RE: HTTP binding options (Wednesday, 12 November)
• RE: HTTP binding options (Monday, 10 November)
• RE: HTTP binding options (Monday, 10 November)

David Snelling

• Re: Attributes in WSDL (Tuesday, 4 November)

FABLET Youenn

• Re: HTTP binding options (Monday, 17 November)
• Re: HTTP binding options (Thursday, 13 November)
• Re: A schema for each mep? (Monday, 10 November)
• Re: HTTP binding options (Monday, 10 November)
• A schema for each mep? (Monday, 10 November)

Glen Daniels

• Re: Schemas in imported WSDL (Saturday, 15 November)
• Re: Primer example & ambiguity issue (Friday, 14 November)
• Re: Schemas in imported WSDL (Friday, 14 November)
• Re: Schemas in imported WSDL (Friday, 14 November)
• Re: Schemas in imported WSDL (Friday, 14 November)
• RE: Schemas in imported WSDL (Thursday, 13 November)
• Re: HTTP binding options (Wednesday, 12 November)
• Re: What WSDL defines - the diagram! (Thursday, 6 November)

Jacek Kopecky

• proposal for combining the two attribute operation styles to one (Tuesday, 25 November)
• Re: Schemas in imported WSDL (Friday, 14 November)
• Re: Schemas in imported WSDL (Friday, 14 November)
• Re: Schemas in imported WSDL (Thursday, 13 November)
• Re: HTTP binding options (Wednesday, 12 November)
• Re: Action item (2003-10-30) Proposed Revised wording and splitting of rules for RPC (Monday, 3 November)
• RE: RPC Style Issues (3) (Monday, 3 November)

Jean-Jacques Moreau

• Re: Marking WSDL operations as "safe", in scope requirement? (Thursday, 13 November)
• Re: HTTP binding options (Thursday, 13 November)
• Re: HTTP binding options (Thursday, 13 November)
• Re: ALTERNATIVE PROPOSAL: Short-cut syntax for in-out and in-only patterns (Monday, 3 November)
• ALTERNATIVE PROPOSAL: Short-cut syntax for in-out and in-only patterns (Monday, 3 November)
• Re: editorial question: change NS prefixes in bindings doc? (Monday, 3 November)

Jeffrey Schlimmer

• RE: should binding/operation/infault|outfault@messageReference be optional? (Thursday, 20 November)
• RE: HTTP binding options (Wednesday, 19 November)
• RE: HTTP binding options (Wednesday, 19 November)
• RE: Schemas in imported WSDL (Wednesday, 19 November)
• Minutes: 13 Nov 2003 WS Description Teleconference (Friday, 14 November)
• RE: HTTP binding options (Wednesday, 12 November)
• RE: HTTP binding options (Wednesday, 12 November)
• RE: HTTP binding options (Wednesday, 12 November)
• RE: should binding/operation/infault|outfault@messageReference be opt ional? (Wednesday, 12 November)
• RE: HTTP binding options (Wednesday, 12 November)
• interface/operation/{infault,outfault}/@name proposal (Monday, 3 November)
• RE: editorial question: change NS prefixes in bindings doc? (Monday, 3 November)

Jim Webber

• RE: Attributes in WSDL (Sunday, 2 November)
• RE: What does WSDL describe? (Sunday, 2 November)
• RE: What does WSDL describe? (Sunday, 2 November)

Jonathan Marsh

• RE: Agenda, 20 November 2003 WS Desc telcon (Friday, 21 November)
• Agenda, 20 November 2003 WS Desc telcon (Wednesday, 19 November)
• Agenda, 13 November 2003 WS Desc telcon (Tuesday, 11 November)
• Revisiting WSDL Compontent Designators (Tuesday, 11 November)
• RE: New issue [distobj@acm.org: Re: What does WSDL describe?] (Tuesday, 11 November)
• Summary: 3-5 Nov 2003 WS Description FTF (Friday, 7 November)
• Minutes: 5 Nov 2003 WS Description FTF (Friday, 7 November)
• Minutes: 4 Nov 2003 WS Description FTF (Friday, 7 November)
• Minutes: 3 Nov 2003 WS Description FTF (Friday, 7 November)

Liu, Kevin

• RE: Action item (2003-10-30) Proposed Revised wording and splitti ng of rules for RPC (Thursday, 13 November)
• RE: should binding/operation/infault|outfault@messageReference be opt ional? (Thursday, 13 November)
• should binding/operation/infault|outfault@messageReference be opt ional? (Monday, 10 November)
• RE: are fault-replaces-message (FRM) and message-triggers-fault ( MTF) equivalent (Saturday, 8 November)
• RE: are fault-replaces-message (FRM) and message-triggers-fault ( MTF) equivalent (Friday, 7 November)

Mark Baker

• Re: Agenda, 20 November 2003 WS Desc telcon (Friday, 21 November)
• Re: HTTP binding options (Wednesday, 19 November)
• Re: Agenda, 20 November 2003 WS Desc telcon (Wednesday, 19 November)
• Re: Primer example & ambiguity issue (Friday, 14 November)
• Primer example & ambiguity issue (Friday, 14 November)
• Re: HTTP binding options (Thursday, 13 November)
• Re: HTTP binding options (Thursday, 13 November)
• Re: HTTP binding options (Wednesday, 12 November)
• Re: New issue [distobj@acm.org: Re: What does WSDL describe?] (Tuesday, 11 November)
• Re: HTTP binding options (Monday, 10 November)
• Re: HTTP binding options (Monday, 10 November)
• Re: HTTP binding options (Monday, 10 November)
• Re: HTTP binding options (Monday, 10 November)
• Re: What WSDL defines - the diagram! (Thursday, 6 November)
• Re: What WSDL defines - the diagram! (Wednesday, 5 November)
• Re: What WSDL defines - the diagram! (Tuesday, 4 November)
• Re: What WSDL defines - the diagram! (Tuesday, 4 November)
• Re: What WSDL defines - the diagram! (Tuesday, 4 November)

Martin Gudgin

• RE: Schemas in imported WSDL (Saturday, 15 November)
• RE: Schemas in imported WSDL (Friday, 14 November)
• RE: Schemas in imported WSDL (Thursday, 13 November)
• RE: Schemas in imported WSDL (Thursday, 13 November)
• RE: What WSDL defines - the diagram! (Friday, 7 November)
• RE: What WSDL defines - the diagram! (Friday, 7 November)
• RE: What WSDL defines - the diagram! (Thursday, 6 November)

paul.downey@bt.com

• RE: Schemas in imported WSDL (Friday, 14 November)
• RE: HTTP binding options (Wednesday, 12 November)
• RE: HTTP binding options (Wednesday, 12 November)
• RE: What WSDL defines - the diagram! (Wednesday, 5 November)
• RE: What WSDL defines - the diagram! (Tuesday, 4 November)
• RE: What WSDL defines - the diagram! (Tuesday, 4 November)
• What WSDL defines - the diagram! (Tuesday, 4 November)
• RE: are fault-replaces-message (FRM) and message-triggers-fault (MTF) equivalent (Monday, 3 November)
• RE: are fault-replaces-message (FRM) and message-triggers-fault (MTF) equivalent (Monday, 3 November)

Philippe Le Hegaret

• WSDL 2.0: Core Language and Message Patterns updated (Monday, 10 November)
• Re: HTTP binding options (Monday, 10 November)
• Re: HTTP binding options (Monday, 10 November)
• Re: HTTP binding options (Monday, 10 November)
• Re: HTTP binding options (Friday, 7 November)

Roberto Chinnici

• Re: HTTP binding options (Monday, 10 November)

Sanjiva Weerawarana

• Re: Schemas in imported WSDL (Friday, 14 November)
• Re: Schemas in imported WSDL (Thursday, 13 November)
• Re: HTTP binding options (Thursday, 13 November)
• Re: HTTP binding options (Thursday, 13 November)
• Re: Schemas in imported WSDL (Thursday, 13 November)
• Re: HTTP binding options (Monday, 10 November)
• Re: HTTP binding options (Monday, 10 November)
• Re: HTTP binding options (Monday, 10 November)
• Re: What WSDL defines - the diagram! (Friday, 7 November)
• HTTP binding options (Thursday, 6 November)
• Re: RPC Style Issues Part (1) - spec updated (Monday, 3 November)
• PROPOSAL: SOAP binding syntax cleanup (Sunday, 2 November)
• editorial question: change NS prefixes in bindings doc? (Sunday, 2 November)
• are fault-replaces-message (FRM) and message-triggers-fault (MTF) equivalent (Sunday, 2 November)
• Re: RPC Style Issues Part (2) - spec updated (Sunday, 2 November)
• Re: RPC Style Issues Part (1) - spec updated (Sunday, 2 November)
• Re: RE: RPC Style Issues (3) (Sunday, 2 November)

Savas Parastatidis

• RE: What WSDL defines - the diagram! (Tuesday, 11 November)
• RE: Attributes in WSDL (Tuesday, 4 November)
• RE: What WSDL defines - the diagram! (Tuesday, 4 November)

Sedukhin, Igor S

• RE: Revisiting WSDL Compontent Designators (Thursday, 13 November)
• RE: What WSDL defines - the diagram! (Friday, 7 November)

Tom Jordahl

• RE: Schemas in imported WSDL (Friday, 14 November)
• RE: Schemas in imported WSDL (Thursday, 13 November)

Umit Yalcinalp

• Re: Action item (2003-10-30) Proposed Revised wording and splitti ng of rules for RPC (Thursday, 13 November)
• Re: Counterproposal for service references (Wednesday, 5 November)
• Attributes Task Force Presentation for F2F (Tuesday, 4 November)
• Re: RPC Style Issues Part (1) - spec updated (Sunday, 2 November)
• Re: RPC Style Issues (3) (Sunday, 2 November)
• Action item (2003-10-30) Proposed Revised wording and splitting of rules for RPC (Sunday, 2 November)

Yuxiao Zhao

• on WSDL 2.0 Part 1: Core Language, 031110 (Friday, 14 November)

Last message date: Tuesday, 25 November 2003 11:26:40 UTC