RE: HTTP binding options from Jeffrey Schlimmer on 2003-11-19 (www-ws-desc@w3.org from November 2003)

From: Jeffrey Schlimmer <jeffsch@windows.microsoft.com>
Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2003 11:27:09 -0800
To: "Mark Baker" <distobj@acm.org>, "David Orchard" <dorchard@bea.com>
Cc: <www-ws-desc@w3.org>
Message-ID: <DDE1793D7266AD488BB4F5E8D38EACB803E90ECD@WIN-MSG-10.wingroup.windeploy.ntdev.mi>

And when people confuse the transport with the end-to-end information
:-)

> -----Original Message-----
> From: www-ws-desc-request@w3.org [mailto:www-ws-desc-request@w3.org]
On
> Behalf Of Mark Baker
> Sent: Wednesday, November 12, 2003 11:21 AM
> To: David Orchard
> Cc: www-ws-desc@w3.org
> Subject: Re: HTTP binding options
> 
> 
> On Wed, Nov 12, 2003 at 01:24:35PM -0500, David Orchard wrote:
> > I think I am saying that is a feature not a bug.  In the case of a
> banking customer I was talking to, they want the transaction # in the
URL.
> >
> > Does this mess things up in the "infoset uber alles" approach?
> 
> Don't you hate it when customers prefer that the architecture not be
> protocol independent? 8-)
> 
> Mark.

Received on Wednesday, 19 November 2003 14:26:34 UTC