W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-ws-desc@w3.org > November 2003

RE: HTTP binding options

From: <paul.downey@bt.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2003 19:40:43 -0000
Message-ID: <2B7789AAED12954AAD214AEAC13ACCEF0FFF1D92@i2km02-ukbr.domain1.systemhost.net>
To: <distobj@acm.org>, <dorchard@bea.com>
Cc: <www-ws-desc@w3.org>
i'll cross that bridge if i'm ever unlucky enough to meet one who is :-)

	-----Original Message----- 
	From: Mark Baker [mailto:distobj@acm.org] 
	Sent: Wed 12/11/2003 19:21 
	To: David Orchard 
	Cc: www-ws-desc@w3.org 
	Subject: Re: HTTP binding options

	On Wed, Nov 12, 2003 at 01:24:35PM -0500, David Orchard wrote:
	> I think I am saying that is a feature not a bug.  In the case of a banking customer I was talking to, they want the transaction # in the URL.
	> Does this mess things up in the "infoset uber alles" approach? 
	Don't you hate it when customers prefer that the architecture not be
	protocol independent? 8-)

Received on Wednesday, 12 November 2003 14:40:45 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 23:06:36 UTC