RE: HTTP binding options from paul.downey@bt.com on 2003-11-12 (www-ws-desc@w3.org from November 2003)

From: <paul.downey@bt.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2003 19:40:43 -0000
To: <distobj@acm.org>, <dorchard@bea.com>
Cc: <www-ws-desc@w3.org>
Message-ID: <2B7789AAED12954AAD214AEAC13ACCEF0FFF1D92@i2km02-ukbr.domain1.systemhost.net>

i'll cross that bridge if i'm ever unlucky enough to meet one who is :-)
Paul

 -----Original Message----- 
 From: Mark Baker [mailto:distobj@acm.org] 
 Sent: Wed 12/11/2003 19:21 
 To: David Orchard 
 Cc: www-ws-desc@w3.org 
 Subject: Re: HTTP binding options
 
 


 On Wed, Nov 12, 2003 at 01:24:35PM -0500, David Orchard wrote:
 > I think I am saying that is a feature not a bug.  In the case of a banking customer I was talking to, they want the transaction # in the URL.
 >
 > Does this mess things up in the "infoset uber alles" approach? 
 
 Don't you hate it when customers prefer that the architecture not be
 protocol independent? 8-)
 
 Mark.

Received on Wednesday, 12 November 2003 14:40:45 UTC