- From: Jacek Kopecky <jacek.kopecky@systinet.com>
- Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2003 10:28:17 -0800
- To: Glen Daniels <gdaniels@sonicsoftware.com>
- Cc: "Amelia A. Lewis" <alewis@tibco.com>, Martin Gudgin <mgudgin@microsoft.com>, tomj@macromedia.com, abrookes@roguewave.com, WS-Description WG <www-ws-desc@w3.org>
Glen, I intentionally omitted the word guarantee.
Just as we cannot give any guarantee that the import will be available,
just as we cannot give any guarantee that WSDLs over 10k will be
processed, we cannot provide guarantees (or any kind of simple language,
it seems) about those imports. On the other hand, if I was implementing
a WSDL processor, I think I'd make that case possible almost
inadvertently.
Jacek Kopecky
Systinet Corporation
http://www.systinet.com/
On Fri, 2003-11-14 at 08:05, Glen Daniels wrote:
> > I also agree on the semantics as far as Gudge formulated it.
> >
> > But I thought WSDL A can use schema C inlined in WSDL B if WSDL A
> > wsdl:imports WSDL B and xs:imports schema C (probably omitting the
> > location attribute).
>
> That was pretty much the jist of the conversation we had at the F2F; whether or
> not there should be any guarantee of being able to do just that. Apparently
> the answer is "no", though.
>
> --G
>
>
Received on Friday, 14 November 2003 13:29:31 UTC