RE: Schemas in imported WSDL

So if we are doing what Schema does, which way is it?

 a. WSDL import does import embedded schema
 b. WSDL import does not make embedded schema's visible

Alan is right that I thought that if I wsdl:import'd a document with an
interface in it, that interface was probably going to use something in the
<types> element, so that the importing document could use them.

Or am I hopelessly confused about import vs. include like the rest of the
world. :-)

--
Tom Jordahl
Macromedia Server Development

-----Original Message-----
From: Martin Gudgin [mailto:mgudgin@microsoft.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, November 12, 2003 7:40 PM
To: Allen Brookes; www-ws-desc@w3.org
Subject: RE: Schemas in imported WSDL


I don't understand why wsdl:import would work any differently from
xsd:import in this respect. I thought we thrashed this out on e-mail a
while back...

Gudge

> -----Original Message-----
> From: www-ws-desc-request@w3.org 
> [mailto:www-ws-desc-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Allen Brookes
> Sent: 12 November 2003 16:29
> To: 'www-ws-desc@w3.org'
> Subject: Schemas in imported WSDL
> 
> 
> The question came up at the face-to-face whether a 
> wsdl:import imported any embedded schemas.  As I remember 
> Glen, Tom and Sanjiva all thought that it should while 
> Roberto thought that it did not.  Was there any resolution to 
> this issue?
> 
> Allen
> 
>

Received on Thursday, 13 November 2003 09:44:28 UTC