- From: Jean-Jacques Moreau <jean-jacques.moreau@crf.canon.fr>
- Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2003 15:58:03 +0100
- To: David Orchard <dorchard@bea.com>
- Cc: www-ws-desc@w3.org
David, This issue was briefly discussed before [3], but did not (yet?) make it into the issues list. Are you raising this as a new issue? Jean-Jacques. [3] <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2002Jun/0013.html> David Orchard wrote: > I haven't been able to tell from the drafts, and my apologies for that, > whether WSDL 2.0 supports marking operations as "safe" or not. I think this > hasn't been addressed yet in the bindings work, but I could be wrong. I > don't quite see this as a standalone requirement in [1] though R125 comes > close. Is there intention to support this as part of the bindings work? > > As background, I ask this as this was a suggestion of the TAG in the TAG > issue 7 finding [2]. The extracted text is "However, to represent safety in > a more straightforward manner, it should be a property of operations > themselves, not just a feature of bindings." > > FWIW, I have also heard some customers want this functionality as they don't > have a standardized "ping" message so they want to use a safe request and > need a way of knowing. > > Cheers, > Dave > [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/ws-desc-reqs/ > [2] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/doc/whenToUseGet.html
Received on Thursday, 13 November 2003 09:59:33 UTC