Re: Schemas in imported WSDL

Um, must've been one of my more jetlagged moments .. I do recall
the email discussion where Gudge explained the XSD rules and pointed
out we should not (and could not, really) change those rules of
exposure.

Sanjiva.

----- Original Message -----
From: "Allen Brookes" <abrookes@roguewave.com>
To: "'Sanjiva Weerawarana'" <sanjiva@watson.ibm.com>; "Allen Brookes"
<abrookes@roguewave.com>; <www-ws-desc@w3.org>
Sent: Thursday, November 13, 2003 9:39 PM
Subject: RE: Schemas in imported WSDL


> The discussion was one of the last on Wednesday.  The question was
whether,
> when importing a wsdl that contained an embedded schema, the schema is
> accessible to the importing wsdl.  I thought I remembered you on the side
> that thought that the schema should be accessible.
>
> Allen
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Sanjiva Weerawarana [mailto:sanjiva@watson.ibm.com]
> Sent: Thursday, November 13, 2003 4:44 AM
> To: Allen Brookes; www-ws-desc@w3.org
> Subject: Re: Schemas in imported WSDL
>
>
> Hi Allen,
>
> I can't remember which discussion you are referring to - can you
> refresh my memory please? Anything I said about schema should
> be taken very lightly since my knowledge about XSD is very,
> very light at best!
>
> Sanjiva.
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Allen Brookes" <abrookes@roguewave.com>
> To: <www-ws-desc@w3.org>
> Sent: Thursday, November 13, 2003 6:29 AM
> Subject: Schemas in imported WSDL
>
>
> >
> > The question came up at the face-to-face whether a wsdl:import imported
> any
> > embedded schemas.  As I remember Glen, Tom and Sanjiva all thought that
it
> > should while Roberto thought that it did not.  Was there any resolution
to
> > this issue?
> >
> > Allen

Received on Thursday, 13 November 2003 10:49:32 UTC