- From: Mark Baker <distobj@acm.org>
- Date: Tue, 4 Nov 2003 10:41:37 -0500
- To: paul.downey@bt.com
- Cc: www-ws-desc@w3.org
Cool, thanks for tackling that at the f2f.
But I disagree with the diagram. As it was explained to me, a WSDL 2.0
document could be said to "describe the syntax" of client and service
("schema in, schema out"), rather than "define the behaviour", which
would require defining what in/out means in relation to any requested
semantics (aka the protocol).
WSDL 1.1 describes the protocol in that it suggests that a successful
response to a message means that the requested operation in the message
was successfully invoked. WSDL 2.0 is ambiguous.
Mark.
--
Mark Baker. Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA. http://www.markbaker.ca
Received on Tuesday, 4 November 2003 10:42:44 UTC