- From: Martin Gudgin <mgudgin@microsoft.com>
- Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2003 12:00:12 -0800
- To: "Glen Daniels" <gdaniels@sonicsoftware.com>, "Jacek Kopecky" <jacek.kopecky@systinet.com>, "Amelia A. Lewis" <alewis@tibco.com>
- Cc: <tomj@macromedia.com>, <abrookes@roguewave.com>, "WS-Description WG" <www-ws-desc@w3.org>
Hang on. The case Jacek has listed below SHOULD work. Why? Because WSDL A has EXPLICITLY imported that namespace. And the WSDL processor that's dealing with WSDL A and WSDL B can use the schema from WSDL B to satisfy the import in WSDL A. Gudge > -----Original Message----- > From: Glen Daniels [mailto:gdaniels@sonicsoftware.com] > Sent: 14 November 2003 08:05 > To: Jacek Kopecky; Amelia A. Lewis > Cc: Martin Gudgin; tomj@macromedia.com; > abrookes@roguewave.com; WS-Description WG > Subject: Re: Schemas in imported WSDL > > > I also agree on the semantics as far as Gudge formulated it. > > > > But I thought WSDL A can use schema C inlined in WSDL B if WSDL A > > wsdl:imports WSDL B and xs:imports schema C (probably omitting the > > location attribute). > > That was pretty much the jist of the conversation we had at > the F2F; whether or not there should be any guarantee of > being able to do just that. Apparently the answer is "no", though. > > --G > > >
Received on Friday, 14 November 2003 15:00:15 UTC