- From: Mark Baker <distobj@acm.org>
- Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2003 14:34:07 -0500
- To: Jeffrey Schlimmer <jeffsch@windows.microsoft.com>
- Cc: David Orchard <dorchard@bea.com>, www-ws-desc@w3.org
And when people confuse transfer with transport? 8-) (we could probably go on ... 8-) On Wed, Nov 19, 2003 at 11:27:09AM -0800, Jeffrey Schlimmer wrote: > And when people confuse the transport with the end-to-end information > :-) > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: www-ws-desc-request@w3.org [mailto:www-ws-desc-request@w3.org] > On > > Behalf Of Mark Baker > > Sent: Wednesday, November 12, 2003 11:21 AM > > To: David Orchard > > Cc: www-ws-desc@w3.org > > Subject: Re: HTTP binding options > > > > > > On Wed, Nov 12, 2003 at 01:24:35PM -0500, David Orchard wrote: > > > I think I am saying that is a feature not a bug. In the case of a > > banking customer I was talking to, they want the transaction # in the > URL. > > > > > > Does this mess things up in the "infoset uber alles" approach? > > > > Don't you hate it when customers prefer that the architecture not be > > protocol independent? 8-) > > > > Mark. > -- Mark Baker. Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA. http://www.markbaker.ca
Received on Wednesday, 19 November 2003 14:32:08 UTC