- From: Mark Baker <distobj@acm.org>
- Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2003 14:21:16 -0500
- To: David Orchard <dorchard@bea.com>
- Cc: www-ws-desc@w3.org
On Wed, Nov 12, 2003 at 01:24:35PM -0500, David Orchard wrote: > I think I am saying that is a feature not a bug. In the case of a banking customer I was talking to, they want the transaction # in the URL. > > Does this mess things up in the "infoset uber alles" approach? Don't you hate it when customers prefer that the architecture not be protocol independent? 8-) Mark.
Received on Wednesday, 12 November 2003 14:19:25 UTC