- From: Jim Webber <jim.webber@arjuna.com>
- Date: Sun, 2 Nov 2003 16:54:16 -0000
- To: <paul.downey@bt.com>, <distobj@acm.org>, <sanjiva@watson.ibm.com>
- Cc: <www-ws-desc@w3.org>
Paul: > To me this is really a service design issue: If 'foo' simply > secures, rather than process the document, then i'd call it > 'submitOrder' and expect to have to call other foos before i > actually bought a motorbike. > > I'd accept calling it messageExchange so long as continuing > to generate code from WSDL or WSDL from code isn't treated as heresy. What is heresy is generating stub code like you would against CORBA IDL. I like the idea of generating code that binds to messages (described in WSDL). I rather less like the idea of "binding to a Web Service" which seems far too tightly coupled. Jim
Received on Sunday, 2 November 2003 12:07:26 UTC